On the role of object representations in substitution masking.

Three experiments were conducted to investigate the role of object representations in object substitution masking (OSM). OSM occurs when a very sparse mask is presented simultaneously with a target stimulus and the target offsets first, leaving the mask to linger in the display for some time. Results confirm earlier claims that there is an isolatable object-level component to OSM and indicate that a target can be protected from OSM if, prior to offsetting, it can be represented as a distinct object from the mask. When the mask was presented as sliding past the target (Experiment 1), as jiggling independently of the target (Experiment 2), or in a different color from the target (Experiment 3), OSM was reduced or eliminated. This suggests that OSM reflects basic updating processes that allow the perception of continuity of object identity over change.

[1]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Perceptual Organization in Vision , 2002 .

[2]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Visual masking : an integrative approach , 1984 .

[3]  A. Mack,et al.  Metacontrast Masking and Attention , 1999 .

[4]  P. A. Kolers Aspects of motion perception , 1972 .

[5]  Z. Pylyshyn The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.

[6]  A. Michotte The perception of causality , 1963 .

[7]  Frouke Hermens,et al.  Comment on "Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes" (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000). , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Ronald A. Rensink The Dynamic Representation of Scenes , 2000 .

[9]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Objects, Attributes, and Visual Attention: Which, What, and Where , 1992 .

[10]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  G Francis,et al.  Quantitative theories of metacontrast masking. , 2000, Psychological review.

[12]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  E. Goldstein Sensation and perception, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[14]  B. Scholl Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.

[15]  N. Kanwisher Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[16]  Z. Pylyshyn Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision , 2001, Cognition.

[17]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Masking by object substitution: dissociation of masking and cuing effects. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  M. Chun,et al.  Asymmetric object substitution masking. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Object substitution without reentry , 2002 .

[21]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[22]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[23]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  C. Moore,et al.  When the target becomes the mask: using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Stimulus-Onset Asynchrony Is Not Necessary for Motion Perception or Metacontrast Masking , 1993 .

[26]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking , 1995, Nature.

[27]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[28]  Gregory Francis,et al.  Developing a new quantitative account of backward masking , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  J. Enns,et al.  What’s new in visual masking? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  M. Chun,et al.  The spatial gradient of visual masking by object substitution , 2001, Vision Research.