Tensile strength and impact resistance properties of materials used in prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets.

Prosthetic sockets serve as the interface between people with amputations and their prostheses. Although most materials used to make prosthetic sockets have been used for many years, knowledge of these materials' properties is limited, especially after they are subjected to fabrication processes. This study evaluated tensile and impact properties of the current state-of-the-art materials used to fabricate prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets. Thermolyn Rigid and Orfitrans Stiff check socket materials produced significantly lower tensile strength and impact resistance than polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG). Copolymer socket materials exhibited greater resistance to impact forces than the check socket materials but lower tensile strengths than PETG. The heated molding processes, for the check socket and copolymer materials, reduced both tensile strength and elongation at break. Definitive laminated sockets were sorted according to fabrication techniques. Nyglass material had significantly higher elongation, indicating a more ductile material than carbon-based laminations. Carbon sockets with pigmented resin had higher tensile strength and modulus at break than nonpigmented carbon sockets. Elongation at yield and elongation at break were similar for both types of carbon-based laminations. The material properties determined in this study provide a foundation for understanding and improving the quality of prosthetic sockets using current fabrication materials and a basis for evaluating future technologies.

[1]  Sam L. Phillips,et al.  Material Properties of Selected Prosthetic Laminates , 2005 .

[2]  H. Cochrane,et al.  Lower limb amputation Part 3: Prosthetics - a 10 year literature review , 2001, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[3]  J Gibson,et al.  Lower limb amputation. , 2001, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[4]  W. A. M. B Rekelmans,et al.  Predictive modelling of the properties and toughness of polymeric materials , 2000 .

[5]  Heh Han Meijer,et al.  Predictive modelling of the properties and toughness of polymeric materials Part II Effect of microstructural properties on the macroscopic response of rubber-modified polymers , 2000 .

[6]  C. Michael Schuch Thermoplastic Applications in Lower Extremity Prosthetics , 1990 .

[7]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  CAD/CAM transtibial prosthetic sockets from central fabrication facilities: how accurate are they? , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[8]  B L Klasson,et al.  Carbon fibre and fibre lamination in prosthetics and orthotics: Some basic theory and practical advice for the practitioner , 1995, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[9]  G K Klute,et al.  The thermal conductivity of prosthetic sockets and liners , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[10]  Heh Han Meijer,et al.  Quantitative Prediction of Long-Term Failure of Polycarbonate , 2005 .

[11]  Heh Han Meijer,et al.  Localisation phenomena in glassy polymers: influence of thermal and mechanical history , 2003 .

[12]  Robert Terry,et al.  Use of Copolymer for Interfaces in All Levels of Prosthetic Applications , 1990 .