Abstract — This paper is concerned with distributed limited memory prediction for continuous-time linear stochastic systems with multiple sensors. A distributed fusion with the weighted sum structure is applied to the optimal local limited memory predictors. The distributed prediction algorithm represents the optimal linear fusion by weighting matrices under the minimum mean square criterion. The algorithm has the parallel structure and allows parallel processing of observations making it reliable since the rest faultless sensors can continue to the fusion estimation if some sensors occur faulty. The derivation of equations for error cross-covariances between the local predictors is the key of this paper. Example demonstrates effectiveness of the distributed limited memory predictor. Index Terms — limited memory, multisensory, Kalman filter, prediction —————————— —————————— 1 I NTRODUCTION N many applications, multiple sensors observe a com-mon origin, for example, system state [1, 2]. If there are no constraints on communication channels and proces-sor bandwidths, complete measurements can be brought to a central processor for data processing. In this case, sensors act as simple data collectors and do not perform any data processing. One of the advantages of this centra-lized processing is that it involves minimal information loss. However, it can result in severe computational over-head. Also, there needs to be a somewhat ideal assump-tion on the environment mentioned above. In practice, especially when sensors are dispersed over a wide geographic area, there are limitations on the amount of communications allowed among sensors. Also, sensors are provided with processing capabilities. In this case, a certain amount of computation can be performed at the individual sensors and a compressed version of sensor data can be transmitted to a fusion center where the re-ceived information is appropriately combined to yield the global inference. The advantage of the distribution of fil-ters is that the parallel structures would lead to increase the input data rates and make easy fault detection and isolation. However, the accuracy of the distributed filter or predictor is generally lower than of the centralized fil-ter. Various distributed and parallel versions of the stan-dard Kalman filter have been reported for linear dynamic systems [2-8]. To get a more accurate estimate of a state of system under potential uncertainty, various kinds of techniques have been introduced and discussed. Among them, a limited memory technique called receding horizon, which is ro-bust against temporal uncertainty, has been rigorously investigated [9-12]. In this paper, we study the distributed receding horizon fusion prediction for the continuous-time linear systems with multiple sensors. The local re-ceding horizon predictors (LRHPs), which we fuse, utilize finite measurements over the most recent time interval [9-12]. It has been a general rule that the LRHPs are often robust against dynamic model uncertainties and numeri-cal errors than the standard filters, which utilize all mea-surements. Based on the LRHPs [10, 12] and the optimal fusion formula with matrix weights [8, 13], we propose a distributed receding horizon predictor which has a better accuracy than every LRHP, and it has the reduced com-putational burden as compared to the centralized reced-ing horizon predictor (CRHP). This paper is organized as follows. The problem is set up in Section II. The CRHP is described in Section III. In Section IV, we present the main result regarding the dis-tributed receding horizon predictor (DRHP) for multisen-sor environment. Here the key equations for cross-covariances between LRHPs are derived. In Section V, example illustrates performance of the CRHP and DRHP. In Section VI, concluding remarks are given
[1]
J. A. Roecker,et al.
Comparison of two-sensor tracking methods based on state vector fusion and measurement fusion
,
1988
.
[2]
Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.
On optimal track-to-track fusion
,
1997,
IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.
[3]
F. Lewis.
Optimal Estimation: With an Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory
,
1986
.
[4]
Tae-Sun Choi,et al.
Generalized Millman's formula and its application for estimation problems
,
2006,
Signal Process..
[5]
Wook Hyun Kwon,et al.
A receding horizon Kalman FIR filter for linear continuous-time systems
,
1999,
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..
[6]
Chongzhao Han,et al.
Optimal linear estimation fusion .I. Unified fusion rules
,
2003,
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.
[7]
Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.
Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking
,
1995
.
[8]
V. Pugachev,et al.
Stochastic Differential Systems Analysis and Filtering
,
1987
.
[9]
Chongzhao Han,et al.
Optimal Linear Estimation Fusion — Part I : Unified Fusion Rules
,
2001
.
[10]
Yunmin Zhu,et al.
The optimality for the distributed Kalman filtering fusion with feedback
,
2001,
Autom..
[11]
Vladimir Shin,et al.
An Optimal Receding Horizon FIR Filter for Continuous-Time Linear Systems
,
2006,
2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference.
[12]
Vladimir Shin,et al.
Optimal receding horizon filter for continuous-time nonlinear stochastic systems
,
2007
.
[13]
Richard M. Stanley.
Optimal Estimation With an Introduction to Stochastic Control
,
1988
.
[14]
Sumit Roy,et al.
Decentralized structures for parallel Kalman filtering
,
1988
.
[15]
Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.
The Effect of the Common Process Noise on the Two-Sensor Fused-Track Covariance
,
1986,
IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.
[16]
Wook Hyun Kwon,et al.
Optimal FIR filters for time-varying state-space models
,
1990
.
[17]
H.F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.
General decentralized Kalman filters
,
1994,
Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.
[18]
Zhi Tian,et al.
Performance evaluation of track fusion with information matrix filter
,
2002
.
[19]
Yunmin Zhu,et al.
An efficient algorithm for optimal linear estimation fusion in distributed multisensor systems
,
2006,
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.
[20]
Elbert Hendricks,et al.
Linear Control System Design
,
2009
.
[21]
Yakov Bar-Shalom,et al.
Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking: Principles and Techniques
,
1995
.
[22]
Kai-Yuan Cai,et al.
Multisensor Decision And Estimation Fusion
,
2003,
The International Series on Asian Studies in Computer and Information Science.