Multidisciplinary Multifidelity Optimisation of a Flexible Wing Aerofoil for Small UAV

The preliminary Multidisciplinary Design and Optimisation (MDO) of a flexible wing aerofoil apropos a small Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) is performed using a multifidelity model-based strategy. Both the passively adaptive structure and the shape of the flexible wing aerofoil are optimised for best aerodynamic performance under aero-structural constraints, within a coupled aeroelastic formulation. A typical flight mission for surveillance purposes is considered and includes the potential occurrence of wind gusts. A metamodel for the high-fidelity objective function and each of the constraints is built, based on a tuned low-fidelity one, in order to improve the efficiency of the optimisation process. Both metamodels are based on solutions of the aeroelastic equations for a flexible aerofoil but employ different levels of complexity and computational cost for modelling aerodynamics and structural dynamics within a modal approach. The high-fidelity model employs nonlinear Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) coupled with a full set of prescribed structural modes, whereas the low-fidelity one employs linear thin aerofoil theory coupled with a reduced set of the latter. The low-fidelity responses are then corrected according to few high-fidelity responses, as prescribed by an appropriate Design of Experiment (DOE), by means of a suitable tuning technique. A standard Genetic Algorithm (GA) is hence utilised to find the global optimum, showing that a flexible aerofoil is characterised by higher aerodynamic efficiency than its rigid counterpart.

[1]  Dominique Claude Marie Poirel Random dynamics of a structurally nonlinear airfoil in turbulent flow , 2001 .

[2]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  Introduction to Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity , 2002 .

[3]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Low-Speed Aeroelastic Modeling of Very Flexible Slender Wings with Deformable Airfoils , 2008 .

[4]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  A Modern Course in Aeroelasticity , 1981, Solid Mechanics and Its Applications.

[5]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: With Applications , 1984 .

[6]  Daniella E. Raveh,et al.  Numerical Simulation and Reduced-Order Modeling of Airfoil Gust Response , 2005 .

[7]  Krishnamurty Karamcheti,et al.  Principles of ideal-fluid aerodynamics , 1966 .

[8]  David A. Peters,et al.  A State-Space Airloads Theory for Flexible Airfoils , 2006 .

[9]  H. Glauert The elements of aerofoil and airscrew theory , 1926 .

[10]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Adaptive Aeroelastic Structures , 2007 .

[11]  Vassili Toropov,et al.  The use of simplified numerical models as mid-range approximations , 1996 .

[12]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Nonlinear Response of Airfoil Section with Control Surface Freeplay to Gust Loads , 2000 .

[13]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  New approach to finite-state modeling of unsteady aerodynamics , 1986 .

[14]  Anand Natarajan,et al.  Aeroelasticity of Morphing Wings Using Neural Networks , 2002 .

[15]  Natalia Grafeeva,et al.  Genetic algorithms and genetic programming , 2013 .

[16]  T. Theodorsen General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter , 1934 .

[17]  A. E. Holdo̸,et al.  Fluid Structure Interaction Modelling , 2004 .

[18]  Richard L. Bielawa,et al.  Rotary wing structural dynamics and aeroelasticity , 1992 .

[19]  Brian Sanders,et al.  MODELLING AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF A VARIABLE GEOMETRY TRAILING EDGE CONTROL SURFACE , 2003 .

[20]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  Introduction to Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity: Contents , 2002 .

[21]  Robert Hewson,et al.  Multifidelity metamodel building as a route to aeroelastic optimization of flexible wings , 2011 .

[22]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  NEW APPROACH TO FINITE STATE MODELLING OF UNSTEADY AERODYNAMICS. , 1986 .

[23]  T. Simpson,et al.  Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria , 2001 .

[24]  Yuan-Cheng Fung,et al.  An introduction to the theory of aeroelasticity , 1955 .

[25]  John R. Wolberg,et al.  Data Analysis Using the Method of Least Squares: Extracting the Most Information from Experiments , 2005 .

[26]  Hans A. Eschenauer,et al.  Emerging methods for multidisciplinary optimization , 2001 .

[27]  Eric L. Hathaway,et al.  ACTIVE AND PASSIVE TECHNIQUES FOR TILTROTOR AEROELASTIC STABILITY AUGMENTATION , 2005 .

[28]  T.H.G. Megson,et al.  Aircraft structures for engineering students , 1972 .

[29]  J. Vale,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Morphing Wing for an Experimental UAV , 2006 .

[30]  J. Gordon Leishman,et al.  Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics , 2000 .

[31]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[32]  Sung-Dae Kim,et al.  AEROELASTIC ANALYSIS OF A FLEXIBLE AIRFOIL WITH A FREEPLAY NON-LINEARITY , 1996 .

[33]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity and Loads , 2007 .