Interactional Competence across Proficiency Levels: How do Learners Manage Interaction in Paired Speaking Tests?

Paired speaking tasks are now commonly used in both pedagogic and assessment contexts, as they elicit a wide range of interactional skills. The current study aims to offer an investigation of the interaction co-constructed by learners at different proficiency levels who are engaged in a paired speaking test, and to provide insights into the conceptualization of interactional competence and key distinguishing interactional features across levels. The findings suggest that our understanding of interactional competence both in the classroom and as a construct underlying tests and assessment scales needs to broaden to include not just interactional features such as topic development organization, but also listener support strategies and turn-taking management. A more comprehensive understanding of interactional competence has the potential to complement available descriptions of interactional skills in assessment scales of speaking and aid learners and teachers in communicative classrooms.

[1]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[2]  Carsten Roever,et al.  Language testing: The social dimension , 2006 .

[3]  Barry O'Sullivan,et al.  Using observation checklists to validate speaking-test tasks , 2002 .

[4]  M. Orr The FCE Speaking test: using rater reports to help interpret test scores , 2002 .

[5]  E. Galaczi PEER-PEER INTERACTION IN A PAIRED SPEAKING TEST: THE CASE OF FCE , 2010 .

[6]  Hongyin Tao,et al.  Turn Initiators in Spoken English: A Corpus-Based Approach to Interaction and Grammar , 2003 .

[7]  George Psathas,et al.  Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction , 1994 .

[8]  Luna Filipović,et al.  Criterial Features in L2 English: Specifying the Reference Levels of the Common European Framework , 2012 .

[9]  Gail Jefferson,et al.  Caveat Speaker: Preliminary Notes on Recipient Topic-Shift Implicature , 1993 .

[10]  Zhengdong Gan,et al.  Interaction in group oral assessment: A case study of higher- and lower-scoring students , 2010 .

[11]  Annette Capel,et al.  A1–B2 vocabulary: insights and issues arising from the English Profile Wordlists project , 2010 .

[12]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 2015 .

[13]  J. Coates Women, men, and language , 1986 .

[14]  P. Have Doing conversation analysis , 2007 .

[15]  Gail Jefferson,et al.  Structures of Social Action: On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters , 1985 .

[16]  Anthony Green Language Functions Revisited: Theoretical and Empirical Bases for Language Construct Definition Across the Ability Range , 2012 .

[17]  Anne Lazaraton,et al.  A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests , 2002 .

[18]  Annie Brown,et al.  Assessing paired orals: Raters' orientation to interaction , 2009 .

[19]  Anthony Green,et al.  Developing assessment scales for large-scale speaking tests: a multiple-method approach , 2011 .

[20]  吉島 茂,et al.  文化と言語の多様性の中のCommon European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR)--それは基準か? (第10回明海大学大学院応用言語学研究科セミナー 講演) , 2008 .

[21]  D. Tannen You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. morrow , 1990 .

[22]  Claire J. Kramsch From Language Proficiency to Interactional Competence , 1986 .

[23]  Lyle F. Bachman,et al.  语言测试实践 = Language testing in practice , 1998 .

[24]  Anita M. Pomerantz,et al.  Conversation analysis: an approach to the study of social action as sense making practices , 1997 .

[25]  M. Swain,et al.  THEORETICAL BASES OF COMMUNICATIVE APPROACHES TO SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND TESTING , 1980 .

[26]  Pat Moore Collaborative interaction in turn-taking: a comparative study of European bilingual (CLIL) and mainstream (MS) foreign language learners in early secondary education , 2011 .

[27]  N. Verhelst,et al.  Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment , 2009 .

[28]  Lyn May,et al.  Co-constructed interaction in a paired speaking test: The rater's perspective , 2009 .

[29]  Michael McCarthy,et al.  Understanding non-restrictive which-clauses in spoken English, which is not an easy thing , 2001 .

[30]  Michael McCarthy,et al.  Spoken fluency revisited , 2010 .

[31]  J. M. Atkinson Structures of Social Action: Contents , 1985 .

[32]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Examining dialogue: another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores , 2001 .

[33]  Robin Wooffitt,et al.  Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications , 1998 .

[34]  T. Stivers,et al.  Negotiating who presents the problem: Next speaker selection in pediatric encounters , 2001 .

[35]  Liz Hamp-Lyons,et al.  Topic Negotiation in Peer Group Oral Assessment Situations: A Conversation Analytic Approach , 2009 .

[36]  Evelina D. Galaczi,et al.  Peer–Peer Interaction in a Speaking Test: The Case of the First Certificate in English Examination , 2008 .

[37]  Hansun Zhang Waring Displaying Substantive Recipiency in Seminar Discussion , 2002 .

[38]  Barry O’Sullivan,et al.  Learner acquaintanceship and oral proficiency test pair-task performance , 2002 .