Attention to self-referential stimuli: can I ignore my own face?

Auto-referential materials (i.e., the own name) have been described as particularly prone to capture attention. Some recent studies have questioned this view and shown that these own name effects are temporary and appear only in specific conditions: when enough resources are available (Harris, C. R., & Pashler, H. (2004). Attention and the processing of emotional words and names: Not so special after all. Psychological Science, 15, 171-178) or when the own name is presented within the focus of attention if it is a task-irrelevant stimulus (Gronau, N., Cohen, A., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2003). Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: A combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 512-529). In the present study, a stimulus that is unique to each individual was used: the self-face. In Experiment 1, the self-face produced a temporary distraction when presented at fixation during a digit-parity task. However, this distraction was not different from that triggered by another highly familiar face. In Experiment 2, the self-face failed to produce interference when presented outside the focus of attention. These results confirm recent findings showing that auto-referential materials do not automatically summon attention and have a distractive power only in specific conditions.

[1]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980 .

[2]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Theories and measurement of visual attentional processing in anxiety , 2008 .

[3]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Short article: one's own face is hard to ignore , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: a combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  R. Kawashima,et al.  Passive and Active Recognition of One's Own Face , 2000, NeuroImage.

[6]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual "cocktail party" effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  N. Moray Attention in Dichotic Listening: Affective Cues and the Influence of Instructions , 1959 .

[8]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  Brain response to one's own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome. , 2006, Archives of neurology.

[9]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Reduced Repetition Blindness for One's Own Name , 1999 .

[11]  G Wolford,et al.  Processing of unattended visual information , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[12]  H. Pashler,et al.  Moray Revisited: High-Priority Affective Stimuli and Visual Search , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  Jun-ichiro Kawahara,et al.  Does one's name attract visual attention? , 2004 .

[14]  H. Gray,et al.  P 300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli q , 2004 .

[15]  Claude Delpuech,et al.  Brain responses to a subject's own name uttered by a familiar voice , 2006, Brain Research.

[16]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Self-consciousness in non-communicative patients , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  H. Gray,et al.  P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli , 2004 .

[18]  E. Fox,et al.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Cognitive psychology, 7th ed. , 2005 .

[20]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[21]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Attention and the Processing of Emotional Words and Names , 2004, Psychological science.

[22]  R. M. Jensen,et al.  Is visual attention automatically attracted by one’s own name? , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: an event-related brain potential study , 2006, Neuroreport.

[24]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[25]  J. Laarni,et al.  Images of a Familiar Face Do not Capture Attention under Conditions of Inattention , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[26]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  I. Rock,et al.  Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention. , 1998 .

[28]  K. Forster,et al.  Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention. , 2004, Psychological review.

[29]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain , 2006 .

[30]  T. Onitsuka,et al.  P300 in response to the subject's own face , 1998, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[31]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Neural mechanisms involved in the detection of our first name: a combined ERPs and PET study , 2005, Neuropsychologia.