Monitoring Long‐Term Population Change: Why are there so Many Analysis Methods?

Monitoring long-term population change is an integral part of effective conservation-oriented research and management, and is central to the current debate on the status of Neotropical migrant land birds. However, the analysis of count data such as the Breeding Bird Survey is complicated by the subjective nature of trend estimation, and by limitations inherent to extensive, volunteer-based surveys, such as measurement error and missing data. A number of analysis methods have been used that differ in their approach to dealing with these complications and produce different estimates of population change when applied to the same data. There is, however, no consensus as to which method is the most suitable. Many analytical issues remain unresolved, such as model of trend, observer effects, treatment of missing observations, distribution of counts, and data selection criteria. These issues make it difficult to evaluate the relative merits of the methods, although a number of new approaches (nonlinear regression, Poisson regression, estimating equations estimates) offer promising solutions to some problems. I suggest the use of Monte Carlo simulations to empirically test the performance of the methods under realistic, spatially explicit scenarios of population change, and provide an example of the approach.

[1]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Estimation of Trends in Bird Populations with an Example: The Pine Warbler , 1988 .

[2]  J. Lawton,et al.  Range, population abundance and conservation. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  J. Sauer,et al.  Topics in route-regression analysis , 1990 .

[4]  Gregory S. Butcher,et al.  Overview of national bird population monitoring programs and databases , 1993 .

[5]  C. McCulloch,et al.  New Approaches to the Analysis of Population Trends in Land Birds , 1997 .

[6]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies , 1992 .

[7]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Data-Based Selection of an Appropriate Biological Model: The Key to Modern Data Analysis , 1992 .

[8]  D. Bystrak,et al.  The north american breeding bird survey. , 1981 .

[9]  Deborah M. Finch,et al.  Status and management of neotropical migratory birds , 1993 .

[10]  K. Titus,et al.  Detecting trends in hawk migration count data , 1990 .

[11]  R. Lacy,et al.  The Correlation Between Range Size and Local Abundance of Some North American Birds , 1986 .

[12]  W. Link,et al.  Bias of animal population trend estimates , 1988 .

[13]  W. Link,et al.  Observer differences in the North American Breeding Bird Survey , 1994 .

[14]  A. Jassby,et al.  Detecting Changes in Ecological Time Series , 1990 .

[15]  M. D. Mountford.  An Index of Population Change With Application to the Common Bird Census , 1985 .

[16]  R. Bailey.  An index of bird population changes on farmland , 1967 .

[17]  James H. Brown,et al.  Are Declines in North American Insectivorous Songbirds Due to Causes on the Breeding Range , 1993 .

[18]  J. Larivée,et al.  A checklist approach for monitoring neotropical migrant birds: Twenty-year trends in birds of Quebec Using EPOQ , 1993 .

[19]  B. Noon,et al.  Estimates of avian population trends from the North American Breeding Bird Survey , 1981 .

[20]  Barrie Goldsmith,et al.  Monitoring for Conservation and Ecology , 1990 .

[21]  D. Edwards,et al.  Autoregressive trend analysis: an example using long-term ecological data , 1987 .