Peer Influence in Network Markets: An Empirical Investigation

We analyze the effect of peer influence on the diffusion of an innovative network good. We argue that the adopters of a network good have an incentive to convince others to purchase the same product because their utility depends on the number of other users. This peer-effect influences individuals’ adoption decisions alongside the more familiar installed-base-effect, based on the individual’s own insight that a larger number of installed units increases his/her benefit of adopting. We test empirically which effect dominates with Instant Messaging, an innovative network good. We arrive at surprising results with far-reaching implications for research and management. The diffusion of Instant Messaging was to a large extent driven by the peer-effect, but the installedbase- effect seemed to play no role. We perform our estimation with a discrete time hazard rate model that controls for unobserved heterogeneity.

[1]  G. Lilien,et al.  Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Hee-Su Kim,et al.  The advantage of network size in acquiring new subscribers: a conditional logit analysis of the Korean mobile telephony market , 2003, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[3]  David De Cremer,et al.  Cooperating If One's Goals are Collective-Based: Social Identification Effects in Social Dilemmas as a Function of Goal-Transformation , 2007 .

[4]  Garth Saloner,et al.  Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with Funding from Adoption of Technologies Uith Network Effects: an Empirical Examination of the Adoption of Automated Teller Machines , 2022 .

[5]  M. A. Halebsky.  Adolescent alcohol and substance abuse: parent and peer effects. , 1987, Adolescence.

[6]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[7]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[8]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[9]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  The Influence of Familial and Peer-Based Reference Groups on Consumer Decisions , 1992 .

[10]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  F. Bass.  A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[12]  Patricia M. Doney,et al.  Shopping with friends and teens' susceptibility to peer influence , 2004 .

[13]  P. Stoneman,et al.  The Economics of Technological Diffusion , 2001 .

[14]  Stephen E. Margolis,et al.  Network externality : an uncommon tragedy , 1994 .

[15]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[16]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[17]  E Gruber,et al.  Cognitive development and adolescent contraception: integrating theory and practice. , 1987, Adolescence.

[18]  Neil Gandal.  Hedonic Price Indexes for Spreadsheets and an Empirical Test for Network Externalities , 1994 .

[19]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions , 1992 .

[20]  Gordon C. Bruner,et al.  Marketing Scales Handbook: A Compilation of Multi-Item Measures , 1992 .

[21]  P. Hill,et al.  Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung , 1992 .

[22]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[23]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[24]  Stephen P. Jenkins,et al.  Easy Estimation Methods for Discrete-Time Duration Models , 1995 .

[25]  F. Lorenz,et al.  Effects of Parental Behavior on Tobacco Use by Young Male Adolescents. , 1993 .

[26]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization , 1994 .

[27]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action , 2000, CSCW '00.

[28]  N. Economides.  The economics of networks , 1996 .

[29]  Stan J. Liebowitz,et al.  The Fable of the Keys , 1990, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[30]  Cornelia Pechmann,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Joint Effects of Advertising and Peers on Adolescents' Beliefs and Intentions about Cigarette Consumption , 2002 .

[31]  Rabikar Chatterjee,et al.  The Innovation Diffusion Process in a Heterogeneous Population: A Micromodeling Approach , 1990 .

[32]  A. Ichino,et al.  Clean Evidence on Peer Effects , 2006, Journal of Labor Economics.

[33]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  The character, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace , 2002, CSCW '02.

[34]  Xueming Luo.  How Does Shopping with Others Influence Impulsive Purchasing? , 2005 .

[35]  John Jainschigg,et al.  Instant messaging , 2001 .

[36]  Z. Griliches.  HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[37]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Instant messaging in teen life , 2002, CSCW '02.

[38]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Product Introduction with Network Externalities , 1992 .

[39]  N. Derzko,et al.  Innovators and imitators in innovation diffusion modelling , 1988 .

[40]  C. C. von Weizsaker,et al.  A Welfare Analysis of Barriers to Entry , 1980 .

[41]  E. Lazear,et al.  Peer Pressure and Partnerships , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[42]  W. Bearden,et al.  Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions , 1982 .

[43]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[44]  J. Gentry,et al.  Characteristics of Adopters and Non-Adopters of Home Computers , 1983 .