Assessing pelagic and benthic metabolism using free water measurements

Automated in situ sensors for measuring changes in dissolved oxygen (DO) at high frequency have facilitated estimates of gross primary production (GPP) and respiration (R) in aquatic systems. Lake researchers usually rely on a single sensor for these estimates, but such point measurements may miss important spatial heterogeneity in within‐lake processes and may not accurately represent systemwide values of metabolism. Here we combine simultaneous measurements of metabolism using DO sensors along transects from the shore to the center of a lake with a spatial model to better understand the underlying heterogeneity in processes contributing to whole‐lake epilimnetic metabolism. We use this model to achieve better estimates of epilimnetic GPP and R and to determine the relative contributions of benthic‐littoral vs. pelagic processes to these estimates. We compared the spatially explicit process‐based model to estimates of metabolism from both a single sensor at the lake's center and a spatially explicit averaging of multiple sensor sites. Estimates of both GPP and R varied on average 2.5‐ to 3.2‐fold from site to site within the same lake, whereas variations were sometimes as high as 6‐ to 7‐fold. Estimates of GPP and R near the perimeter of lakes were on average greater than measurements in the middle of the lake. Our model estimates that benthic‐littoral processes accounted for ~40% of epilimnetic GPP and R. A single, centrally located sensor often misses a significant component of this benthic metabolism and accounts for only ~81% of lakewide GPP and R.

[1]  M. Iqbal.  An introduction to solar radiation , 1983 .

[2]  R. Wanninkhof.  Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean , 1992 .

[3]  C. Langdon.  Dissolved oxygen monitoring system using a pulsed electrode: design, performance, and evoluation , 1984 .

[4]  J. Cole,et al.  Impact of chemically enhanced diffusion on dissolved inorganic carbon stable isotopes in a fertilized lake , 2006 .

[5]  Clifford N. Dahm,et al.  Wholeߚstream metabolism in two montane streams: Contribution of the hyporheic zone , 2001 .

[6]  R. Freckleton,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1999 .

[7]  H. Odum.  Primary Production in Flowing Waters1 , 1956 .

[8]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  ECOSYSTEM SUBSIDIES: TERRESTRIAL SUPPORT OF AQUATIC FOOD WEBS FROM 13C ADDITION TO CONTRASTING LAKES , 2005 .

[9]  M. Pace,et al.  Respiration in lakes , 2005 .

[10]  John E. Petersen,et al.  Implicit scaling in the design of experimental aquatic ecosystems , 1999 .

[11]  U. Uehlinger,et al.  Ecosystem Metabolism, Disturbance, and Stability in a Prealpine Gravel Bed River , 1998, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[12]  Steven W. Effler,et al.  Metabolic rate estimates for a eutrophic lake from diel dissolved oxygen signals , 2002, Hydrobiologia.

[13]  G. Kling,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Supersaturation in the Surface Waters of Lakes , 1994, Science.

[14]  E. Fee.  A relation between lake morphometry and primary productivity and its use in interpreting whole-lake eutrophication experiments , 1979 .

[15]  Chung-Chi Chen,et al.  SCALING AQUATIC PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY: EXPERIMENTS UNDER NUTRIENT- AND LIGHT-LIMITED CONDITIONS , 1997 .

[16]  Paul C. Hanson,et al.  Gross primary production and respiration differences among littoral and pelagic habitats in northern Wisconsin lakes , 2006 .

[17]  W. Kemp,et al.  Nutrient uptake in experimental estuarine ecosystems : scaling and partitioning rates , 2000 .

[18]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Persistence of net heterotrophy in lakes during nutrient addition and food web manipulations , 2000 .

[19]  Giorgio Matteucci,et al.  Seasonal net carbon dioxide exchange of a beech forest with the atmosphere , 1996 .

[20]  Lars Håkanson,et al.  The Importance of Lake Morphometry for the Structureand Function of Lakes , 2005 .

[21]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[22]  G. Likens,et al.  Enrichment experiments for determining nutrient limitation: Four methods compared1 , 1975 .

[23]  U. Uehlinger,et al.  Contribution of the Hyporheic Zone to Ecosystem Metabolism in a Prealpine Gravel-Bed-River , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[24]  William M. Lewis,et al.  Uncertainty in the Estimation of Stream Metabolism from Open-Channel Oxygen Concentrations , 1998, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[25]  Peter S. Maitland,et al.  The trophic cascade in lakes , 1998 .

[26]  N. Caraco,et al.  Contrasting impacts of a native and alien macrophyte on dissolved oxygen in a large river , 2002 .

[27]  J. Downing,et al.  The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments , 2006 .

[28]  David M. Lodge,et al.  From Greenland to green lakes : Cultural eutrophication and the loss of benthic pathways in lakes , 2003 .

[29]  R. Weiss.  The solubility of nitrogen, oxygen and argon in water and seawater , 1970 .

[30]  S. Chapra.  Surface Water-Quality Modeling , 1996 .

[31]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Inter‐biome comparison of factors controlling stream metabolism , 2001 .

[32]  M. Pace,et al.  Hydrologic Variability of Small, Northern Michigan Lakes Measured by the Addition of Tracers , 1998, Ecosystems.

[33]  B. Peterson.  Aquatic Primary Productivity and the 14C-CO2 Method: A History of the Productivity Problem , 1980 .

[34]  D. Hartmann.  Global Physical Climatology , 1994 .

[35]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Lake metabolism: Relationships with dissolved organic carbon and phosphorus , 2003 .