MRI to CT Prostate Registration for Improved Targeting in Cancer External Beam Radiotherapy

External radiotherapy is a major clinical treatment for localized prostate cancer. Currently, computed tomography (CT) is used to delineate the prostate and to plan the radiotherapy treatment. However, CT images suffer from a poor soft-tissue contrast and do not allow an accurate organ delineation. On the contrary, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides rich details and high soft-tissue contrast, allowing tumor detection. Thus, the intraindividual propagation of MRI delineations toward the planning CT may improve tumor targeting. In this paper, we introduce a new method to propagate MRI prostate delineations to the planning CT. In the first step, a random forest classification is performed to coarsely detect the prostate in the CT images, yielding a prostate probability membership for each voxel and a prostate hard segmentation. Then, the registration is performed using a new similarity metric which maximizes the probability and the collinearity between the normals of the manual registration (MR) existing contour and the contour resulting from the CT classification. The first study on synthetic data was performed to analyze the influence of the metric parameters with different levels of noise. Then, the method was also evaluated on real MR-CT data using manual alignments and intraprostatic fiducial markers and compared to a classically used mutual information (MI) approach. The proposed metric outperformed MI by 7% in terms of Dice score coefficient, by 3.14 mm the Hausdorff distance, and 2.13 mm the markers position errors. Finally, the impact of registration uncertainties on the treatment planning was evaluated, demonstrating the potential advantage of the proposed approach in a clinical setup to define a precise target.

[1]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A Pattern Recognition Approach to Zonal Segmentation of the Prostate on MRI , 2012, MICCAI.

[2]  T Haycocks,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the radiation treatment planning of localized prostate cancer using intra-prostatic fiducial markers for computed tomography co-registration. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[4]  Dan Ash,et al.  Impact of prostate volume evaluation by different observers on CT-based post-implant dosimetry. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  Yinghuan Shi,et al.  Prostate Segmentation in CT Images via Spatial-Constrained Transductive Lasso , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  Patrick W McLaughlin,et al.  The use of mutual information in registration of CT and MRI datasets post permanent implant. , 2004, Brachytherapy.

[7]  J. Deasy,et al.  Radiation dose-volume effects in radiation-induced rectal injury. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  An adaptive MR-CT registration method for MRI-guided prostate cancer radiotherapy , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  David R. Haynor,et al.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using multiparametric MRI , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  David L. Wilson,et al.  Automatic MR volume registration and its evaluation for the pelvis and prostate. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  C. Fiorino,et al.  Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  Deformable multimodal registration with gradient orientation based on structure tensors , 2012 .

[15]  Keisuke Sasai,et al.  A new two-step accurate CT-MRI fusion technique for post-implant prostate cancer , 2015, Journal of contemporary brachytherapy.

[16]  Rainer Lienhart,et al.  An extended set of Haar-like features for rapid object detection , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[17]  M McJury,et al.  The influence of MRI scan position on image registration accuracy, target delineation and calculated dose in prostatic radiotherapy. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  R. Viard,et al.  Automatic 3D segmentation of prostate in MRI combining a priori knowledge, Markov fields and Bayesian framework , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Multi-Modal Image Registration Based on Gradient Orientations of Minimal Uncertainty , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Dean C. Barratt,et al.  Multiattribute probabilistic prostate elastic registration (MAPPER): application to fusion of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. , 2015, Medical physics.

[21]  David L Wilson,et al.  A comparative study of warping and rigid body registration for the prostate and pelvic MR volumes. , 2003, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[22]  Alexander Wong,et al.  Efficient least squares fusion of MRI and CT images using a phase congruency model , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[23]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  3D Deformable Registration for Monitoring Radiotherapy Treatment in Prostate Cancer , 2007, SCIA.

[24]  Olivier Salvado,et al.  An atlas-based electron density mapping method for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-alone treatment planning and adaptive MRI-based prostate radiation therapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[26]  M. Tenhunen,et al.  Converting from CT- to MRI-only-based target definition in radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer , 2015, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[27]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  Improved Non-rigid Registration of Prostate MRI , 2004, MICCAI.

[28]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Robust Real-time Object Detection , 2001 .

[30]  Fabrice Mériaudeau,et al.  Prostate segmentation with local binary patterns guided active appearance models , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[31]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Robust Real-Time Face Detection , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[32]  M van Herk,et al.  Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: a multi-observer study. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  Mary Feng,et al.  Investigation of a method for generating synthetic CT models from MRI scans of the head and neck for radiation therapy , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  David L. Wilson,et al.  Semiautomatic nonrigid registration for the prostate and pelvic MR volumes. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[35]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  Automated Finite-Element Analysis for Deformable Registration of Prostate Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  David R. Haynor,et al.  Nonrigid multimodality image registration , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[37]  Luca Incrocci,et al.  Deformation of prostate and seminal vesicles relative to intraprostatic fiducial markers. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.