Preschoolers’ use of spatiotemporal history, appearance, and proper name in determining individual identity

Humans construe their environment as composed largely of discrete individuals, which are also members of kinds (e.g., trees, cars, and people). On what basis do young children determine individual identity? How important are featural properties (e.g., physical appearance, name) relative to spatiotemporal history? Two studies examined the relative importance of these factors in preschoolers' and adults' identity judgments. Participants were shown pairs of individuals who looked identical but differed in their spatiotemporal history (e.g., two physically distinct but identical Winnie-the-Pooh dolls), and were asked whether both members in the pair would have access to knowledge that had been supplied to only one of the pairs. The results provide clear support for spatiotemporal history as the primary basis of identity judgments in both preschoolers and adults, and further place issues of identity within the broader cognitive framework of psychological essentialism.

[1]  Robert A. Wilson.  Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays , 1999 .

[2]  Cristina M. Sorrentino.  Children and adults represent proper names as referring to unique individuals , 2001 .

[3]  William J. Turkel,et al.  Children’s and Adults’ Understanding of Proper Namable Things , 2004 .

[4]  H. Wellman,et al.  Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious , 1991, Cognition.

[5]  B. H. Pillow,et al.  Preschool children's use of information about age and perceptual access to infer another person's knowledge. , 1997, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[6]  Serge Brédart,et al.  Preschoolers' use of form class cues to learn descriptive proper names. , 2003, Child development.

[7]  N. Edelstyn,et al.  A review of the phenomenology and cognitive neuropsychological origins of the Capgras syndrome , 1999, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[8]  C. Guardo,et al.  Development of a sense of self-identity in children. , 1971, Child development.

[9]  C. Johnson.  If you had my brain, where would I be? Children's understanding of the brain and identity. , 1990, Child development.

[10]  D. Geoffrey Hall,et al.  Continuity and the Persistence of Objects: When the Whole Is Greater Than the Sum of the Parts , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  George E. Newman,et al.  Tracing the Identity of Objects , 2005 .

[12]  R. Sternberg,et al.  IF YOU CHANGED YOUR NAME AND APPEARANCE TO THOSE OF ELVIS PRESLEY, WHO WOULD YOU BE? HISTORICAL FEATURES IN CATEGORIZATION , 1998 .

[13]  Milton Karl Munitz.  Identity and individuation , 1971 .

[14]  K. Rosengren,et al.  A rose by any other name: Preschoolers' understanding of individual identity across name and appearance changes , 1996 .

[15]  J. Macnamara.  Names for Things: A Study in Human Learning , 1984 .

[16]  A. Ortony,et al.  Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1991 .

[17]  S. Gelman,et al.  How two-year-old children interpret proper and common names for unfamiliar objects. , 1984, Child development.

[18]  S. Carey,et al.  Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Children prefer certain individuals over perfect duplicates , 2008, Cognition.

[20]  Paul Bloom.  Intention, history, and artifact concepts , 1996, Cognition.

[21]  S. Gelman,et al.  Children's understanding of the brain: From early essentialism to biological theory , 1999 .

[22]  F. Keil.  Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[23]  Michael J Chandler,et al.  Addresses for correspondence: , 1995 .

[24]  K. Yardley,et al.  Self and identity : perspectives across the lifespan , 1987 .

[25]  David J. Sheskin,et al.  Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures , 1997 .

[26]  D. Hall,et al.  Young children's use of syntactic cues to learn proper names and count nouns. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[27]  D. Parfit.  Reasons and Persons , 1986 .