Are the Poor Getting Globalized?

One reason that poor people may not capture the full benefit from participation in international markets is that the goods they produce tend to be subject to relatively high trade barriers. This paper analyzes market access barriers faced by households in different income deciles by matching household survey data from India based on the industrial classification of their economic activity. Tariffs in international markets are higher, and nontariff measures more numerous, on goods produced by poor workers than on goods produced by rich workers. Tariffs faced by exporters are higher on goods produced in rural and more remote areas than on those in urban centers, on goods produced by informal enterprises than by formal ones, and on goods produced by women than by men. Furthermore, the global reduction in tariffs from 1996 to 2012 failed to ameliorate these differences. How did we get there? Efforts to protect poor workers across countries resulted in a coordination problem. Indeed, tariff protection in China and the United States is higher on goods produced by poor workers than on goods produced by rich workers. Therefore, if poor workers are employed in similar sectors, then each country's attempts to protect its poor workers by imposing higher tariffs and more nontariff measures on such goods will reduce the access of all poor workers to international markets, and thus limit the gains from trade.

[1]  Kishore Gawande,et al.  Protection for Sale , 2020, Interest Groups and Trade Policy.

[2]  A. Mattoo,et al.  Internal Borders and Migration in India , 2017 .

[3]  Christophe Gouel,et al.  Trade Policy Coordination and Food Price Volatility , 2016 .

[4]  D. Atkin,et al.  Who's Getting Globalized? The Size and Implications of Intra-National Trade Costs , 2015 .

[5]  P. Robertson,et al.  Remoteness, Urbanization, and India's Unbalanced Growth , 2015 .

[6]  B. Kovak Regional Effects of Trade Reform: What Is the Correct Measure of Liberalization? , 2013 .

[7]  M. Emran,et al.  Access to Markets and Rural Poverty: Evidence from Household Consumption in China , 2013, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[8]  B. U. Marchand Tariff pass-through and the distributional effects of trade liberalization , 2012 .

[9]  Junsen Zhang,et al.  Globalization and wage inequality: Evidence from urban China , 2012 .

[10]  Guido G. Porto,et al.  Pro-Poor Trade Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2011 .

[11]  B. McCaig Exporting Out of Poverty: Provincial Poverty in Vietnam and U.S. Market Access , 2011 .

[12]  D. Donaldson Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the Impact of Transportation Infrastructure , 2010 .

[13]  P. Topalova Factor Immobility and Regional Impacts of Trade Liberalization Evidence on Poverty from India , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  Guido Porto International Market Access and Poverty in Argentina , 2010 .

[15]  C. Freund,et al.  Loss Aversion and Trade Policy , 2004 .

[16]  Alessandro Nicita Who Benefited from Trade Liberalization in Mexico? Measuring the Effects on Household Welfare , 2004 .

[17]  L. Winters,et al.  Trade Liberalization and Poverty: The Evidence So Far , 2004 .

[18]  J. Campa,et al.  Exchange Rate Pass-Through into Import Prices: A Macro or Micro Phenomenon? , 2002 .

[19]  P. Abbott Export Restrictions as Stabilization Responses to Food Crisis , 2012 .

[20]  Rick Harris,et al.  State-owned enterprises and state capitalism in China , 2012 .

[21]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Inequality, Growth, and Trade Policy , 2003 .

[22]  A. Wood,et al.  Market Integration, Regionalism and the Global Economy: Openness and wage inequality in developing countries: the Latin American challenge to East Asian conventional wisdom , 1999 .