Analysis of polysaccharide, protein and humic acid retention by microfiltration membranes using Thomas’ dynamic adsorption model

Abstract Thomas’ model has been applied in this study for the quantitative description and parameterization of the dynamic adsorption of organic foulants to membranes by analysis of the permeate concentration as a function of filtration time (or effluent volume). A hydrophilically enhanced polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane was used with dextran (DEX), bovine serum albumin (BSA) and Aldrich humic acid (HA) that were used as model compounds representative of polysaccharides, proteins and humic substances, respectively. Thomas’ model stemming from Langmuirian adsorption kinetics was found to give a good description of physically irreversible membrane fouling as well as the corresponding adsorption constants. The simplification of Langmuirian kinetics to Linear kinetics was found to be reasonable though with no further mathematical simplifications or approximations valid for the case of fouling of a hydrophilically enhanced PVDF membrane. Ka, i.e. the product of the equilibrium constant and the total adsorption capacity, is considered to be a more practicable measure of adsorption affinity than K. The Ka values of 2.09, 2.83 and 3.44 for DEX, BSA and HA, respectively, confirm that the affinity exhibited by foulants typically follows the order: humic substances > proteins > polysaccharides for hydrophilically enhanced PVDF membranes. However, the final adsorbed amount (i.e. the fouling extent) is dependent upon not only the membrane-binding affinity but also the concentration of foulant in the solution.

[1]  G. C. Sarti,et al.  Modelling and simulation of affinity membrane adsorption. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[2]  C. V. Oss,et al.  Interfacial Forces in Aqueous Media , 1994 .

[3]  K. Kimura,et al.  Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. , 2004, Water research.

[4]  H. Schulten,et al.  Three-dimensional models for humic acids and soil organic matter , 1995, Naturwissenschaften.

[5]  Runping Han,et al.  Comparison of linear and nonlinear analysis in estimating the Thomas model parameters for methylene blue adsorption onto natural zeolite in fixed-bed column. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[6]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Comparison of the various kinetic models of non-linear chromatography , 1992 .

[7]  C. J. Oss,et al.  Macroscopic-scale surface properties of streptavidin and their influence on aspecific interactions between streptavidin and dissolved biopolymers , 2003 .

[8]  Henry C. Thomas,et al.  CHROMATOGRAPHY: A PROBLEM IN KINETICS , 1948 .

[9]  A. Zydney,et al.  Humic acid fouling during ultrafiltration , 2000 .

[10]  A. W. Zularisam,et al.  Behaviours of natural organic matter in membrane filtration for surface water treatment — a review , 2006 .

[11]  T. Lin,et al.  Effects of humic substance characteristics on UF performance , 2000 .

[12]  R. Leysen,et al.  A comparison between polysulfone, zirconia and organo-mineral membranes for use in ultrafiltration , 1996 .

[13]  J. Mallevialle,et al.  Effect of adsorption of organic matter on fouling of ultrafiltration membranes , 1993 .

[14]  T. Viraraghavan,et al.  Column studies for biosorption of dyes from aqueous solutions on immobilised Aspergillus niger fungal biomass , 2004 .

[15]  Henry C. Thomas,et al.  Heterogeneous Ion Exchange in a Flowing System , 1944 .

[16]  M. Ulbricht,et al.  Influence of ultrafiltration membrane characteristics on adsorptive fouling with dextrans , 2005 .

[17]  C. Vidal-madjar,et al.  Monte Carlo model of nonlinear chromatography: correspondence between the microscopic stochastic model and the macroscopic Thomas kinetic model. , 2002, Analytical Chemistry.

[18]  Kanji Matsumoto,et al.  Properties of protein adsorption onto pore surface during microfiltration: Effects of solution environment and membrane hydrophobicity , 2006 .

[19]  J. Tóth,et al.  Adsorption : theory, modeling, and analysis , 2002 .

[20]  Tom D. Reynolds,et al.  Unit Operations and Processes in Environmental Engineering , 1995 .

[21]  Richard M. Stuetz,et al.  Characterisation of polymeric fouling in membrane bioreactors and the effect of different filtration modes , 2007 .

[22]  Chung-Hsin Wu,et al.  Hydrophobicity and molecular weight of humic substances on ultrafiltration fouling and resistance , 2008 .

[23]  F. Frimmel,et al.  Interactions between membrane surface, dissolved organic substances and ions in submerged membrane filtration , 2006 .

[24]  Thiruvenkatachari Viraraghavan,et al.  Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions using immobilized fungal biomass in continuous mode , 1998 .

[25]  Kanji Matsumoto,et al.  Adsorption behavior of BSA in microfiltration with porous glass membrane , 1998 .

[26]  A. Karabelas,et al.  An experimental study of UF membrane fouling by humic acid and sodium alginate solutions: the effect of backwashing on flux recovery , 2008 .

[27]  Jean-Philippe Croué,et al.  Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM). , 2004, Water research.

[28]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment , 2006 .

[29]  Eric A. Grulke,et al.  Polymer Process Engineering , 1994 .

[30]  Modeling of protein adsorption equilibrium at hydrophobic solid-water interfaces , 2002 .

[31]  Kanji Matsumoto,et al.  Protein adsorption properties on a microfiltration membrane: A comparison between static and dynamic adsorption methods , 2006 .

[32]  P. M. Williams,et al.  Cleaning results of new and fouled nanofiltration membrane characterized by contact angle, updated DSPM, flux and salts rejection , 2008 .

[33]  T. Viraraghavan,et al.  Adsorption of cadmium from aqueous solutions by perlite. , 2002, Journal of hazardous materials.

[34]  D. Al-Halbouni,et al.  Occurrence and composition of extracellular lipids and polysaccharides in a full-scale membrane bioreactor. , 2009, Water research.

[35]  Christopher Bellona,et al.  Effect of membrane fouling on transport of organic contaminants in NF/RO membrane applications , 2006 .

[36]  Kimberly L. Jones,et al.  Protein and humic acid adsorption onto hydrophilic membrane surfaces: effects of pH and ionic strength , 2000 .

[37]  G. Viviani,et al.  The role of fouling mechanisms in a membrane bioreactor. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[38]  Douglas M. Bates,et al.  Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications , 1988 .