Separation of Detection Authorities (SDA) Approach for Misbehavior Detection in Wireless Ad Hoc Network

Wireless ad hoc network is a distributed wireless network without the presence of a physical network infrastructure. Having a limited wireless transmission range, all the nodes need to cooperate with each other during packet forwarding in order to maintain the connectivity. In addition, the lack of energy resources may cause a selflsh node to drop legitimate packets which eventually disrupt the network performance. In fact, many detection protocols have been proposed to discourage such behaviour. However, the implemented penalization is inefiective as not all the surrounding nodes execute in the same manner. Moreover, most of them have neglected the existence of the malicious node that could in∞ict them directly and indirectly. In this paper, we present the separation of detection authorities (SDA) approach to detect and exclude the misbehaved nodes in the network. The SDA distributes the detection authorities to the reporter, investigation agents, and the central authority where each of them takes charge of difierent detection process. To ensure accuracy, only the central authority will report the result. Our evaluation demonstrated that SDA can detect misbehaved nodes in the network efiectively.

[1]  Levente Buttyán,et al.  Nash equilibria of packet forwarding strategies in wireless ad hoc networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[2]  Mukesh Singhal,et al.  A light-weight solution for selfish nodes problem considering battery status in wireless ad-hoc networks , 2005, WiMob'2005), IEEE International Conference on Wireless And Mobile Computing, Networking And Communications, 2005..

[3]  Refik Molva,et al.  Core: a collaborative reputation mechanism to enforce node cooperation in mobile ad hoc networks , 2002, Communications and Multimedia Security.

[4]  Djamel Djenouri,et al.  Cross-Layer Approach to Detect Data Packet Droppers in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks , 2006, IWSOS/EuroNGI.

[5]  Younghwan Yoo,et al.  A credit-payment scheme for packet forwarding fairness in mobile ad hoc networks , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2005. ICC 2005. 2005.

[6]  Qi He,et al.  SORI: a secure and objective reputation-based incentive scheme for ad-hoc networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733).

[7]  Wesley Chee-Wah Tan,et al.  Enforcing Cooperation in an Ad Hoc Network using a Cost-Credit Based Forwarding and Routing Approach , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[8]  Haiyun Luo,et al.  URSA: ubiquitous and robust access control for mobile ad hoc networks , 2004, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[9]  Djamel Djenouri,et al.  A New Low Cost Sessions-Based Misbehaviour Detection Protocol (SMDP) for MANET , 2007, 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW'07).

[10]  Godwin Ansa,et al.  Detection and accusation of packet forwarding misbehaviour in mobile ad-hoc networks , 2008 .

[11]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  Performance analysis of the CONFIDANT protocol , 2002, MobiHoc '02.