Swipe and Tell

When content consumers explicitly judge content positively, we consider them to be engaged. Unfortunately, explicit user evaluations are difficult to collect, as they require user effort. Therefore, we propose to use device interactions as implicit feedback to detect engagement. We assess the usefulness of swipe interactions on tablets for predicting engagement and make the comparison with using traditional features based on time spent. We gathered two unique datasets of more than 250,000 swipes, 100,000 unique article visits, and over 35,000 explicitly judged news articles by modifying two commonly used tablet apps of two newspapers. We tracked all device interactions of 407 experiment participants during one month of habitual news reading. We employed a behavioral metric as a proxy for engagement, because our analysis needed to be scalable to many users, and scanning behavior required us to allow users to indicate engagement quickly. We point out the importance of taking into account content ordering, report the most predictive features, zoom in on briefly read content and on the most frequently read articles. Our findings demonstrate that fine-grained tablet interactions are useful indicators of engagement for newsreaders on tablets. The best features successfully combine both time-based aspects and swipe interactions.

[1]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[2]  Heather L. O'Brien,et al.  Exploring user engagement in online news interactions , 2011, ASIST.

[3]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Mining touch interaction data on mobile devices to predict web search result relevance , 2013, SIGIR.

[4]  Elizabeth F. Churchill,et al.  Mouse tracking: measuring and predicting users' experience of web-based content , 2012, CHI.

[5]  Jeeyun Oh,et al.  How Does Interactivity Persuade? An Experimental Test of Interactivity on Cognitive Absorption, Elaboration, and Attitudes , 2015 .

[6]  Mark Claypool,et al.  Implicit interest indicators , 2001, IUI '01.

[7]  J. Liu,et al.  Usefulness as the Criterion for Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval , 2009 .

[8]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  User engagement in online News: Under the scope of sentiment, interest, affect, and gaze , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Discovering common motifs in cursor movement data for improving web search , 2014, WSDM.

[10]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[11]  Qian Xu,et al.  User Experience of On-Screen Interaction Techniques: An Experimental Investigation of Clicking, Sliding, Zooming, Hovering, Dragging, and Flipping , 2014, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Jingjing Liu,et al.  Personalizing information retrieval for multi‐session tasks: Examining the roles of task stage, task type, and topic knowledge on the interpretation of dwell time as an indicator of document usefulness , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  A Model for Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval , 2009 .

[14]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Understanding User Attention and Engagement in Online News Reading , 2016, WSDM.

[15]  Rafa Absar,et al.  Toward a Model of Mobile User Engagement , 2013 .

[16]  James Allan,et al.  Comparing In Situ and Multidimensional Relevance Judgments , 2017, SIGIR.

[17]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Towards estimating web search result relevance from touch interactions on mobile devices , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Absence time and user engagement: evaluating ranking functions , 2013, WSDM '13.

[19]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[20]  H. Lilliefors On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown , 1967 .

[21]  Sung Joo Park,et al.  MONERS: A news recommender for the mobile web , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Gleb Gusev,et al.  Future User Engagement Prediction and Its Application to Improve the Sensitivity of Online Experiments , 2015, WWW.

[23]  M. Larsen,et al.  The Psychology of Survey Response , 2002 .

[24]  Véronique Van Vlasselaer,et al.  Fraud Analytics : Using Descriptive, Predictive, and Social Network Techniques:A Guide to Data Science for Fraud Detection , 2015 .

[25]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Predicting Online Shopping Search Satisfaction and User Behaviors with Electrodermal Activity , 2017, WWW.

[26]  Martin Gaedke,et al.  TellMyRelevance!: predicting the relevance of web search results from cursor interactions , 2013, CIKM.

[27]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Improving Web Search Ranking by Incorporating User Behavior Information , 2019, SIGIR Forum.

[29]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Models of user engagement , 2012, UMAP.

[30]  Yoichi Shinoda,et al.  Information filtering based on user behavior analysis and best match text retrieval , 1994, SIGIR '94.

[31]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Exploring mouse movements for inferring query intent , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[32]  Yang Song,et al.  Evaluating and predicting user engagement change with degraded search relevance , 2013, WWW.

[33]  Nicholas D. Lane,et al.  Engagement-aware computing: modelling user engagement from mobile contexts , 2016, UbiComp.

[34]  Steve Fox,et al.  Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search , 2005, TOIS.

[35]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Time-Aware Click Model , 2016, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  Relevance : A Review of the Literature and a Framework for Thinking on the Notion in Information Science . Part III : Behavior and Effects of Relevance , 1976 .

[37]  Stephen Sprigle,et al.  The When of user engagement , 2006 .

[38]  James Allan,et al.  Understanding Ephemeral State of Relevance , 2017, CHIIR.

[39]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Measuring User Engagement , 2014, Measuring User Engagement.

[40]  Elaine Toms,et al.  The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[42]  Zhiyong Wang,et al.  Browse-to-Search: Interactive Exploratory Search with Visual Entities , 2014, TOIS.

[43]  Diane Kelly,et al.  Engagement in Information Search , 2016, Why Engagement Matters.

[44]  Jeff Huang Web User Interaction Mining from Touch-Enabled Mobile Devices , 2012 .

[45]  Jiahui Liu,et al.  Personalized news recommendation based on click behavior , 2010, IUI '10.

[46]  George Valkanas,et al.  Understanding Within-Content Engagement through Pattern Analysis of Mouse Gestures , 2014, CIKM.

[47]  Mark Claypool,et al.  Inferring User Interest , 2001, IEEE Internet Comput..

[48]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  On saliency, affect and focused attention , 2012, CHI.

[49]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Evaluating implicit feedback models using searcher simulations , 2005, TOIS.

[50]  Suju Rajan,et al.  Beyond clicks: dwell time for personalization , 2014, RecSys '14.

[51]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  [Regression modeling strategies]. , 2011, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[52]  Elaine Toms,et al.  What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[53]  Yang Song,et al.  Exploring and exploiting user search behavior on mobile and tablet devices to improve search relevance , 2013, WWW '13.

[54]  Heather L. O'Brien,et al.  Mixed-methods approach to measuring user experience in online news interactions , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[55]  Bradley N. Miller,et al.  GroupLens: applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news , 1997, CACM.

[56]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Personalization of search results using interaction behaviors in search sessions , 2012, SIGIR '12.

[57]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Theoretical Importance of Contingency in Human-Computer Interaction , 2016, Commun. Res..

[58]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Understanding and Measuring User Engagement and Attention in Online News Reading , 2016, WSDM.

[59]  T. Saracevic,et al.  Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[60]  Ryen W. White,et al.  No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search , 2011, CHI.

[61]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Beyond dwell time: estimating document relevance from cursor movements and other post-click searcher behavior , 2012, WWW.

[62]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Different Users, Different Opinions: Predicting Search Satisfaction with Mouse Movement Information , 2015, SIGIR.

[63]  Bracha Shapira,et al.  Study of the usefulness of known and new implicit indicators and their optimal combination for accurate inference of users interests , 2006, SAC.

[64]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences , 2006, SIGIR.

[65]  Diane Kelly,et al.  Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users , 2009, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..