Towards a recommender strategy for personal learning environments

Abstract Personal learning environments (PLEs) aim at putting the learner central stage and comprise a technological approach towards learning tools, services, and artifacts gathered from various usage contexts and to be used by learners. Due to the varying technical skills and competences of PLE users, recommendations appear to be useful for empowering learners to set up their environments so that they can connect to learner networks and collaborate on shared artifacts by using the tools available. In this paper we examine different recommender strategies on their applicability in PLE settings. After reviewing different techniques given by literature and experimenting with our prototypic PLE solution we come to the conclusion to start with an item-based strategy and extend it with model-based and iterative techniques for generating recommendations for PLEs.

[1]  Effie Lai-Chong Law,et al.  Utilising Pattern Repositories for Capturing and Sharing PLE Practices in Networked Communities , 2010 .

[2]  Dominik Benz,et al.  Stop thinking, start tagging: tag semantics emerge from collaborative verbosity , 2010, WWW '10.

[3]  Mark van Harmelen,et al.  Design trajectories: four experiments in PLE implementation , 2008, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[4]  Stelios H. Zanakis,et al.  Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Bernadette Charlier,et al.  Understanding PLE as an Essential Component of the Learning Process , 2008 .

[6]  Stefanie N. Lindstaedt,et al.  A Network Model Approach to Retrieval in the Semantic Web , 2008, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[7]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005 , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  K. Sahl,et al.  Tracing Teachers’ Use of Technology in a Laptop Computer School: The Interplay of Teacher Beliefs, Social Dynamics, and Institutional Culture , 2002 .

[9]  Jun Wang,et al.  Unifying user-based and item-based collaborative filtering approaches by similarity fusion , 2006, SIGIR.

[10]  Dimitris Plexousakis,et al.  Qualitative analysis of user-based and item-based prediction algorithms for recommendation agents , 2005, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[11]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Recommender systems , 1997, CACM.

[12]  Dean P. Foster,et al.  Clustering Methods for Collaborative Filtering , 1998, AAAI 1998.

[13]  Denis Gillet,et al.  The 3A contextual ranking system: simultaneously recommending actors, assets, and group activities , 2009, RecSys '09.

[14]  Tobias Ley,et al.  How Do People Learn at the Workplace? Investigating Four Workplace Learning Assumptions , 2007, EC-TEL.

[15]  Fridolin Wild,et al.  Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments , 2011 .

[16]  Ralf Klamma,et al.  The Troll Under the Bridge: Data Management for HugeWeb Science Mediabases , 2008, GI Jahrestagung.

[17]  Mark Claypool,et al.  Implicit interest indicators , 2001, IUI '01.

[18]  David M. Pennock,et al.  Categories and Subject Descriptors , 2001 .

[19]  George Karypis,et al.  Item-based top-N recommendation algorithms , 2004, TOIS.

[20]  Robin D. Burke,et al.  Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments , 2002, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.