Evidências de validade de conteúdo da versão brasileira do Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21

RESUMO Objetivo: realizar a adaptação transcultural e avaliar as evidências de validade de conteúdo do Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21 para o contexto brasileiro. Método: estudo psicométrico de adaptação transcultural, abrangendo as etapas de tradução, reconciliação, retrotradução, avaliação de equivalência intercultural e análise das evidências de validade de conteúdo, considerando parâmetros de Content Validy Ratio em sobreviventes de câncer de mama. Resultados: as traduções demonstraram equivalência à versão original. Expressões coloquiais foram modificadas, o tempo verbal ajustado, e dois itens contendo múltiplos comandos foram separados. A versão final passou a conter 22 itens, apresentando equivalências semântica, conceitual, idiomática e experimental. Os valores de CVR mantiveram-se acima de 0,87. O pré-teste indicou boa compreensão e facilidade no processo de resposta. Conclusão: a versão final foi definida como “Lista de verificação de sintomas cognitivos relacionados ao trabalho - 22 itens”, apresentando boa equivalência linguística e fortes evidências de validade de conteúdo no contexto brasileiro.

[1]  A. Whittaker,et al.  Prevalence of cognitive impairment following chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[2]  D. Cella,et al.  Association of cognitive impairment and breast cancer survivorship on quality of life in younger breast cancer survivors , 2021, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[3]  Y. Roquelaure,et al.  Return to work of breast cancer survivors: toward an integrative and transactional conceptual model , 2021, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[4]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  N. Ernstmann,et al.  Occupational rehabilitation of male breast cancer patients: Return patterns, motives, experiences, and implications-A qualitative study. , 2021, European journal of cancer care.

[6]  T. Tanigawa,et al.  Predictors of resignation and sick leave after cancer diagnosis among Japanese breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study , 2020, BMC Public Health.

[7]  C. Paiva,et al.  Factors associated with return to work in breast cancer survivors treated at the Public Cancer Hospital in Brazil , 2020, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[8]  M. Jefford,et al.  Building a novel occupational rehabilitation program to support cancer survivors to return to health, wellness, and work in Australia , 2019, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[9]  X. Bonfill,et al.  Socio-economic impact on women diagnosed and treated for breast cancer: a cross-sectional study , 2019, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[10]  J. Wiskemann,et al.  Return to work after breast cancer: The role of treatment-related side effects and potential impact on quality of life. , 2019, European journal of cancer care.

[11]  F. Sperandio,et al.  Qualitative study of return to work following breast cancer treatment. , 2019, Occupational medicine.

[12]  S. Costi,et al.  Factors influencing return to work of cancer survivors: a population-based study in Italy , 2019, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[13]  H. Brenner,et al.  Return to work after cancer. A multi-regional population-based study from Germany , 2019, Acta oncologica.

[14]  R. Bonfiglioli,et al.  Perceived work ability at return to work in women treated for breast cancer: a questionnaire-based study , 2018, La Medicina del lavoro.

[15]  Raylane da Silva Machado,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation methods of instruments in the nursing area. , 2018, Revista gaucha de enfermagem.

[16]  Luis M. Lozano,et al.  Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice , 2018, Psicothema.

[17]  V. Savalei,et al.  Examining the Effect of Reverse Worded Items on the Factor Structure of the Need for Cognition Scale , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  U. Bültmann,et al.  The Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work in cancer patients is related with work functioning, fatigue and depressive symptoms: a validation study , 2015, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[19]  S. Sereika,et al.  Patterns of change in cognitive function with anastrozole therapy , 2015, Cancer.

[20]  W. Zwart,et al.  Cognitive effects of endocrine therapy for breast cancer: keep calm and carry on? , 2015, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Hunter Gehlbach.  Seven Survey Sins , 2015 .

[22]  Francis Guillemin,et al.  A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  F. Guillemin,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: experimental study showed expert committee, not back-translation, added value. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  Andy S. K. Cheng,et al.  Validation of the Chinese Version of the Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21 in Breast Cancer Survivors , 2015, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[25]  Juliana de Lima Lopes Rn,et al.  Experts for Validation Studies in Nursing: New Proposal and Selection Criteria , 2015 .

[26]  S. Schagen,et al.  Systemically Treated Breast Cancer Patients and Controls: An Evaluation of the Presence of Noncredible Performance , 2014, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[27]  M. Feuerstein,et al.  Brief self-report measure of work-related cognitive limitations in breast cancer survivors , 2013, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[28]  Wei Pan,et al.  Recalculation of the Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio , 2012 .

[29]  N. M. C. Alexandre,et al.  Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas , 2011 .

[30]  D. Rubio,et al.  Objectifying Content Validity: Conducting a Content Validity Study in Social Work Research , 2003 .

[31]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. , 2000, Spine.

[32]  L. A. Teixeira,et al.  Breast cancer in Brazil: medicine and public health in 20th century , 2020 .

[33]  Mônica Lima,et al.  O retorno ao trabalho de mulheres após a experiência do câncer de mama: uma metassíntese , 2020 .

[34]  T. Chianca,et al.  THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS FOR THE CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF INSTRUMENTS IN NURSING , 2018 .