The search for reference conditions for stream vegetation in northern Europe

Summary 1. The European Water Framework Directive provides a framework for improving the ecological quality of stream ecosystems, with deviation from reference used as a measure of ecological status. 2. Here we examine the possibility of using less impacted stream sites from Latvia, Lithuania and Poland to establish a Danish reference network for macrophyte assemblages, and as a guiding image for identification of possible references sites within Denmark. Both approaches were evaluated using historical Danish records. 3. Four different macrophyte assemblages were identified for mid‐sized streams in the Central and Eastern Lowland ecoregions. Macrophyte assemblages could not be delineated using physical stream site characteristics; however a gradual change in assemblage composition was attributed to differences in alkalinity and human impact. 4. Assemblages of contemporary vegetation in Denmark were quite similar to those found in Polish, Latvian and Lithuanian streams (26–35%). However, more importantly, from species‐based predictions we noted higher similarity, particularly with Latvian and Lithuanian streams, before intensive land use commenced in Denmark (c. 1900). These results show that stream sites from these three countries can be considered in a Danish reference network. 5. Two of the four macrophyte assemblages comprised species such as Fontinalis antipyretica, Myriophyllum spicatum, Nuphar lutea, Potamogeton alpinus and P. perfoliatus that have a very scattered occurrence in the contemporary vegetation in Denmark. These groups were closely associated with the predictions from historic records, thereby lending support the conjecture that these assemblages could be part of the guiding image for the identification of potential reference sites within Denmark.

[1]  Gunta Springe,et al.  Biological quality metrics: their variability and appropriate scale for assessing streams , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[2]  N. Prat,et al.  Selection and validation of reference sites in small river basins , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[3]  John L Stoddard,et al.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  K. Sand‐Jensen,et al.  Plant communities in lowland Danish streams: species composition and environmental factors , 2000 .

[5]  J. Mountford,et al.  Water Regime Requirements of British Wetland Vegetation: Using the Moisture Classification of Ellenberg and Londo , 1993 .

[6]  Annette Baattrup-Pedersen,et al.  Anvendelse af Vandrammedirektivet i danske vandløb , 2004 .

[7]  T. V. Madsen,et al.  Effects of stream restoration and management on plant communities in lowland streams , 2006 .

[8]  A. Baattrup‐Pedersen,et al.  Macrophyte diversity and composition in relation to substratum characteristics in regulated and unregulated Danish streams , 1999 .

[9]  Richard K. Johnson Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems: Using the Reference Condition Approach , 2005 .

[10]  John Davy-Bowker,et al.  European river plant communities: the importance of organic pollution and the usefulness of existing macrophyte metrics , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[11]  P. Verdonschot,et al.  Establishing reference conditions for European streams , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  Andrea Buffagni,et al.  The Development of a System to Assess the Ecological Quality of Streams Based on Macroinvertebrates – Design of the Sampling Programme within the AQEM Project , 2003 .

[13]  C. Preston Pondweeds of Great Britain and Ireland , 1995 .

[14]  Krzysztof Szoszkiewicz,et al.  Macrophyte communities in unimpacted European streams: variability in assemblage patterns, abundance and diversity , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[15]  Krzysztof Szoszkiewicz,et al.  Assessment of european streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish : a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress , 2006 .

[16]  M. Furse,et al.  Ecological relationships between stream communities and spatial scale: implications for designing catchment‐level monitoring programmes , 2007 .

[17]  Peter Haase,et al.  The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[18]  C. Feijoó,et al.  Baseline water quality and macrophyte assemblages in Pampean streams: a regional approach. , 2007, Water research.

[19]  J. Wright,et al.  Response of the flora and macroinvertebrate fauna of a chalk stream site to changes in management , 2003 .

[20]  Sebastian Birk,et al.  Intercalibration of assessment methods for macrophytes in lowland streams: direct comparison and analysis of common metrics , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[21]  Krzysztof Szoszkiewicz,et al.  Macrophyte communities of European streams with altered physical habitat , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[22]  S. Larsen,et al.  Long-term effects of stream management on plant communities in two Danish lowland streams , 2002, Hydrobiologia.

[23]  K. Sand‐Jensen,et al.  Abundance-range size relationships in stream vegetation in Denmark , 2002, Plant Ecology.

[24]  David M. Harper,et al.  Use of ‘functional habitats’ to link ecology with morphology and hydrology in river rehabilitation , 1999 .

[25]  Tenna Riis,et al.  Historical changes in species composition and richness accompanying perturbation and eutrophication of Danish lowland streams over 100 years , 2001 .

[26]  J. Haury,et al.  Relationships between macrophytic vegetation and physical features of river habitats: the need for a morphological approach , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[27]  James R. Karr,et al.  Assessing Invertebrate Responses to Human Activities: Evaluating Alternative Approaches , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[28]  Leonard Sandin,et al.  Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[29]  An application of canonical correspondence analysis for developing ecological quality assessment metrics for river macrophytes , 2005 .