Improvement in semipermeable membrane performance of wholly aromatic polyamide through an additive processing strategy

A new concept for the method to provide semipermeability in ultrathin and single-component wholly aromatic polyamide membranes has been developed for the first time. It was found that water molecules could permeate through the membrane prepared not from polyamides containing flexible ether, bulky binaphthyl, or fluorene rigid units, but one with carboxylic acid groups under a reverse osmosis mode. However, the enhancement of water transport properties by introducing the hydrophilic group of polyamide was not substantial. Therefore, polyamide membranes were prepared from the solution containing aqueous additives in order to weaken hydrogen bonds between polymer chains and thereby to suppress the aggregation of the polymer chains. As a result, water flux was dramatically improved with slightly improved NaCl rejection. Our analyses based on attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and solid-state carbon polarization and magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (13C CPMAS NMR) spectroscopy confirmed that the aggregation of polymer chains due to the hydrogen bonds among the amide linkages was suppressed by the co-ordination of the aqueous additives to the amide linkage. The state of water in the membranes analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry also supported the formation of pores. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014, 52, 1275–1281

[1]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water , 2012, Nature.

[2]  Linda Zou,et al.  Recent developments in forward osmosis : opportunities and challenges. , 2012 .

[3]  Rui Chin Ong,et al.  Fabrication and positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS) characterization of cellulose triacetate membranes for forward osmosis , 2012 .

[4]  Tai-Shung Chung,et al.  Forward osmosis processes: Yesterday, today and tomorrow , 2012 .

[5]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Thin-film composite hollow fiber membranes for Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) process with high power density , 2012 .

[6]  Tai‐Shung Chung,et al.  The role of sulphonated polymer and macrovoid-free structure in the support layer for thin-film comp , 2011 .

[7]  Young-Jea Kim,et al.  Highly chlorine-resistant end-group crosslinked sulfonated-fluorinated poly(arylene ether) for rever , 2011 .

[8]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[9]  Xiaoxiao Song,et al.  Nano Gives the Answer: Breaking the Bottleneck of Internal Concentration Polarization with a Nanofiber Composite Forward Osmosis Membrane for a High Water Production Rate , 2011, Advanced materials.

[10]  B. Freeman,et al.  Solid-state NMR molecular dynamics characterization of a highly chlorine-resistant disulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) random copolymer blended with poly(ethylene glycol) oligomers for reverse osmosis applications. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[11]  B. Freeman,et al.  Fundamental salt and water transport properties in directly copolymerized disulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) random copolymers , 2011 .

[12]  Ngai Yin Yip,et al.  Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  T. Arnot,et al.  A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalinationDevelopment to date and future poten , 2011 .

[14]  Dezhong Xiao,et al.  The role of physical and chemical parameters on forward osmosis membrane fouling during algae separa , 2011 .

[15]  C. D. Lundin,et al.  A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water , 2010 .

[16]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Water Purification by Membranes: The Role of Polymer Science , 2010 .

[17]  Qian Yang,et al.  Cellulose acetate nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for forward osmosis processes , 2010 .

[18]  Catherine Charcosset,et al.  A review of membrane processes and renewable energies for desalination , 2009 .

[19]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Performance evaluation of sucrose concentration using forward osmosis , 2009 .

[20]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. , 2009, Water research.

[21]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[22]  B. Freeman,et al.  Highly chlorine-tolerant polymers for desalination. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[23]  B. Freeman,et al.  Synthesis and crosslinking of partially disulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) random copolymers as candidates for chlorine resistant reverse osmosis membranes , 2008 .

[24]  Stein Erik Skilhagen,et al.  Membrane processes in energy supply for an osmotic power plant , 2008 .

[25]  Konstantinos Petrotos,et al.  On the direct osmotic concentration of liquid foods. Part I: Impact of process parameters on process performance , 2007 .

[26]  J. Leckie,et al.  Hypochlorite degradation of crosslinked polyamide membranes: II. Changes in hydrogen bonding behavior and performance , 2006 .

[27]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[28]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[29]  Michael A. Hickner,et al.  State of Water in Disulfonated Poly(arylene ether sulfone) Copolymers and a Perfluorosulfonic Acid Copolymer (Nafion) and Its Effect on Physical and Electrochemical Properties , 2003 .

[30]  Shigeji Konagaya,et al.  Reverse osmosis performance and chlorine resistance of new ternary aromatic copolyamides comprising 3,3′-diaminodiphenylsulfone and a comonomer with a carboxyl group , 2001 .

[31]  O. Kedem,et al.  Surface modification of commercial polyamide reverse osmosis membranes by radical grafting: An ATR‐FTIR study , 1998 .

[32]  M. Todoki,et al.  Pore size distribution measurements of polymer hydrogel membranes for artificial kidneys using differential scanning calorimetry , 1995 .

[33]  G. Owen,et al.  Economic assessment of membrane processes for water and waste water treatment , 1995 .

[34]  R. J. Petersen,et al.  Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1993 .

[35]  S. I. Yum,et al.  The osmotic pump: novel research tool for optimizing drug regimens. , 1981, Biomaterials.

[36]  New polymeric materials for reverse osmosis membranes , 1977 .

[37]  C. D. Moody,et al.  Drinking water from sea water by forward osmosis , 1976 .

[38]  B. Zimm,et al.  Sorption of Vapors by High Polymers , 1956 .

[39]  R. E. Oesper,et al.  The Preparation of Naphthidine , 1936 .