Optimum Coordination of Directional Overcurrent Relays Using the Hybrid GA-NLP Approach

The time of operation of overcurrent relays (OCRs) can be reduced, and at the same time, the coordination can be maintained, by selecting the optimum values of time multiplier setting (TMS) and plug setting (PS) of OCRs. This paper presents hybrid genetic algorithm (GA) - nonlinear programming (NLP) approach for determination of optimum values of TMS and PS of OCRs. GA has a drawback of, sometimes, converging to the values which may not be optimum, and NLP methods have a drawback of converging to local optimum values, if the initial choice is nearer to local optimum. This paper proposes a hybrid method to overcome the drawback of GA and NLP method, and determine the optimum settings of OCRs. The main contributions of this paper are - 1) systematic method for formulation of problem of determining optimum values of TMS and PS of OCRs in power distribution network as a constrained nonlinear optimization problem, 2) determining initial values of TMS and PS using GA technique and finding final (global optimum) values using NLP method, thus making use of the advantages of both methods (and at the same time overcoming the drawbacks of the methods).

[1]  Swapan Kumar Goswami,et al.  Distribution Network Reconfiguration Considering Protection Coordination Constraints , 2008 .

[2]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Optimization for Engineering Design: Algorithms and Examples , 2004 .

[3]  A. J. Urdaneta,et al.  Coordination of directional overcurrent relay timing using linear programming , 1996 .

[4]  Hossein Askarian Abyaneh,et al.  Pre-processing of the optimal coordination of overcurrent relays , 2005 .

[5]  K. K. Li,et al.  Application of genetic algorithm to overcurrent relay grading coordination , 1997 .

[6]  Singiresu S. Rao Engineering Optimization : Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[7]  E.F. El-Saadany,et al.  A novel problem formulation for directional overcurrent relay coordination , 2004, 2004 Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering (IEEE Cat. No.04EX819).

[8]  J. Jager,et al.  Advanced Coordination Method for Overcurrent Protection Relays Using Nonstandard Tripping Characteristics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[9]  Y. G. Paithankar,et al.  Fundamentals of Power System Protection , 2004, Optimal Coordination of Power Protective Devices with Illustrative Examples.

[10]  K. K. Li,et al.  Overcurrent relay coordination by evolutionary programming , 2000 .

[11]  H.O. Gupta,et al.  A new nonlinear directional overcurrent relay coordination technique, and banes and boons of near-end faults based approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[12]  Hari Om Gupta,et al.  Application of Random Search Technique in Directional Overcurrent Relay Coordination , 2006 .

[13]  Christine M. Anderson-Cook Practical Genetic Algorithms (2nd ed.): Randy L. Haupt and Sue Ellen Haupt , 2005 .

[14]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[15]  J. Sadeh,et al.  Considering Different Network Topologies in Optimal Overcurrent Relay Coordination Using a Hybrid GA , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[16]  A. Y. Abdelaziz,et al.  An adaptive protection scheme for optimal coordination of overcurrent relays , 2002 .

[17]  M. S. Sachdev,et al.  An on-line relay coordination algorithm for adaptive protection using linear programming technique , 1996 .

[18]  Hossein Askarian Abyaneh,et al.  A new comprehensive genetic algorithm method for optimal overcurrent relays coordination , 2008 .

[19]  Hari Om Gupta,et al.  Time-Overcurrent Relay Coordination: A Review , 2005 .

[20]  A. J. Urdaneta,et al.  Optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays in interconnected power systems , 1988 .

[21]  H.O. Gupta,et al.  An Approach to Tackle the Threat of Sympathy Trips in Directional Overcurrent Relay Coordination , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.