A Well-to-Wheel Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Between Full Electric and Traditional Petrol Engines in the European Context

Automotive sector is crucial for the economic and social system. Conversely, it also plays an important role in the global emissions balance with strong consequences on the environment. Currently the Research world is engaged in the reduction of the emissions, especially in order to contrast the Climate Change and reduce toxicity on humans and the ecosystem. This study presents a comparative Life Cycle Assessment, Well-to-Wheel, between the most common technology used in the automotive sector, i.e. the traditional petrol Internal Combustion Engine and the full Battery Electric Vehicle. The different configurations have been analysed within 17 different impact categories in terms of climate change, human health, resourced depletion and ecosystems. The Well-to-Wheel approach allows to focus the attention on the use stage of the vehicle, considering the local effects due to the direct emissions in high density urban zones and it mitigates the dependence of usage hypotheses, different scenarios and intrinsic differences between the various models of cars in circulation.

[1]  Sandro Barone,et al.  A comparative Life Cycle Assessment of utility poles manufactured with different materials and dimensions , 2017 .

[2]  Eugenio Guglielmino,et al.  Life cycle assessment in yacht industry: A case study of comparison between hand lay-up and vacuum infusion , 2017 .

[3]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance , 2010 .

[4]  Giampaolo Manzolini,et al.  Energy analysis of electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells through well-to-wheel driving cycle simulations , 2009 .

[5]  Andreas Ciroth,et al.  ICT for environment in life cycle applications openLCA — A new open source software for life cycle assessment , 2007 .

[6]  Jeroen B. Guinée,et al.  The Abiotic Depletion Potential: Background, Updates, and Future , 2016 .

[7]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Human health damages due to ionising radiation in life cycle impact assessment , 2000 .

[8]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[9]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[10]  C. Bauer,et al.  Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment Within LCA (11 pp) , 2007 .

[11]  O. Jolliet,et al.  The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA , 2008 .

[12]  M. Hauschild,et al.  USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties , 2011 .