Modeling complex multi-issue negotiations using utility graphs

This paper presents an agent strategy for complex bilateral negotiations over many issues with inter-dependent valuations. We use ideas inspired by graph theory and probabilistic influence networks to derive efficient heuristics for negotiations about multiple issues. Experimental results show --- under relatively weak assumptions with respect to the structure of the utility functions - that the developed approach leads to Pareto-efficient outcomes. Moreover, Pareto-efficiency can be reached with few negotiation steps, because we explicitly model and utilize the underlying graphical structure of complex utility functions. Consequently, our approach is applicable to domains where reaching an efficient outcome in a limited amount of time is important. Furthermore, unlike other solutions for high-dimensional negotiations, the proposed approach does not require a mediator.

[1]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A Classification Scheme for Negotiation in Electronic Commerce , 2001, AgentLink.

[2]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[3]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Combinatorial Auctions with Structured Item Graphs , 2004, AAAI.

[4]  John K. Debenham Bargaining with information , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[5]  Michael I. Jordan Graphical Models , 2003 .

[6]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Automated multi-attribute negotiation with efficient use of incomplete preference information , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[8]  Mark Klein,et al.  Protocols for Negotiating Complex Contracts , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[9]  Han La Poutré,et al.  Online learning of aggregate knowledge about non-linear preferences applied to negotiating prices and bundles , 2004, ICEC '04.

[10]  Mark Klein,et al.  Negotiating Complex Contracts , 2003, AAMAS '02.

[11]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Learning on opponent's preferences to make effective multi-issue negotiation trade-offs , 2004, ICEC '04.

[12]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Optimal negotiation of multiple issues in incomplete information settings , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[13]  Daphne Koller,et al.  Utilities as Random Variables: Density Estimation and Structure Discovery , 2000, UAI.

[14]  Ronald L. Rivest,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms , 1990 .

[15]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents , 1998, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[16]  Fahiem Bacchus,et al.  Graphical models for preference and utility , 1995, UAI.

[17]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations , 2002, Artif. Intell..