Collimator optimization in SPECT based on a joint detection and localization task.

In SPECT the collimator is a crucial element of the imaging chain and controls the noise-resolution tradeoff of the collected data. Optimizing collimator design has been a long studied topic, with many different criteria used to evaluate the design. One class of criteria is task based, in which the collimator is designed to optimize detection of a signal (lesion). Here we consider a new, more realistic task, the joint detection and localization of a signal. Furthermore, we use an ideal observer-one that attains a theoretically maximum task performance-to optimize collimator design. The ideal observer operates on the sinogram data. We consider a family of parallel-hole low-energy collimators of varying resolution and efficiency and optimize over this set. We observe that for a 2D object characterized by noise due to background variability and a sinogram with photon noise, the optimal collimator tends to be of lower resolution and higher efficiency than equivalent commercial collimators. Furthermore, this optimal design is insensitive to the tolerance radius within which the signal must be localized. So for this scenario, the addition of a localization task does not change the optimal collimator. Optimal collimator resolution gets worse as signal size grows, and improves as the level of background variability noise increases. These latter two trends are also observed when the detection task is signal-known-exactly and background variable.

[1]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Bayesian Detection of Random Signals on Random Backgrounds , 1997, IPMI.

[2]  Bin Liu,et al.  On ideal AFROC and FROC observers , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[3]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  The bootstrap and its application in signal processing , 1998, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[4]  G T Gullberg,et al.  Iterative reconstruction of fluorine-18 SPECT using geometric point response correction. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Donald L. Gunter.  CHAPTER 8 – Collimator Design for Nuclear Medicine , 2004 .

[6]  Michael A. King,et al.  An investigation of aliasing with Gaussian-diffusion modeling of SPECT system spatial resolution , 1997 .

[7]  M F Kijewski,et al.  Collimator optimization for lesion detection incorporating prior information about lesion size. , 1995, Medical physics.

[8]  Gene Gindi,et al.  SPECT image system optimization using ideal observer for detection and localization , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  Gengsheng L. Zeng,et al.  A channelized hotelling trace collimator design method based on reconstruction rather than projections , 2001 .

[10]  R. Swensson.  Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images. , 1996, Medical physics.

[11]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  An accelerated convergent ordered subsets algorithm for emission tomography , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  H. Barrett,et al.  Ideal-observer computation in medical imaging with use of Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  P.P. Bruyant,et al.  Numerical observer study of MAP-OSEM regularization methods with anatomical priors for lesion detection in /sup 67/Ga images , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[15]  Eric Clarkson,et al.  Efficiency of the human observer detecting random signals in random backgrounds. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  C E Metz,et al.  A comparison of optimum detector spatial resolution in nuclear imaging based on statistical theory and on observer performance. , 1978, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Gene Gindi,et al.  Decision strategies that maximize the area under the LROC curve , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Hotelling trace criterion as a figure of merit for the optimization of imaging systems , 1986 .

[19]  G. Zeng,et al.  High-sensitivity SPECT imaging using large collimator holes and geometric blurring compensation , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[20]  Gene Gindi,et al.  Collimator optimization in SPECT based on an LROC ideal observer , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[21]  Harrison H Barrett,et al.  Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[22]  Xin He,et al.  Toward Realistic and Practical Ideal Observer (IO) Estimation for the Optimization of Medical Imaging Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  Aperture optimization in emission imaging using ideal observers for joint detection and localization. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Aperture optimization for emission imaging: effect of a spatially varying background. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  Bin Liu,et al.  Ideal AFROC and FROC Observers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Linear discriminants and image quality , 1991, Image Vis. Comput..

[27]  Matthew A Kupinski,et al.  Experimental task-based optimization of a four-camera variable-pinhole small-animal SPECT system , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  Robert M Lewitt,et al.  Small nodule detectability evaluation using a generalized scan-statistic model , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Georges El Fakhri,et al.  Collimator optimization for detection and quantitation tasks: application to gallium-67 imaging , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.