Predicting Alzheimer’s Disease by Hierarchical Graph Convolution from Positron Emission Tomography Imaging

Imaging-based early diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease (AD) has become an effective approach, especially by using nuclear medicine imaging techniques such as Positron Emission Topography (PET). In various literature it has been found that PET images can be better modeled as signals (e.g. uptake of florbetapir) defined on a network (non-Euclidean) structure which is governed by its underlying graph patterns of pathological progression and metabolic connectivity. In order to effectively apply deep learning framework for PET image analysis to overcome its limitation on Euclidean grid, we develop a solution for 3D PET image representation and analysis under a generalized, graph-based CNN architecture (PETNet), which analyzes PET signals defined on a group-wise inferred graph structure. Computations in PETNet are defined in non-Euclidean, graph (network) domain, as it performs feature extraction by convolution operations on spectral-filtered signals on the graph and pooling operations based on hierarchical graph clustering. Effectiveness of the PETNet is evaluated on the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset, which shows improved performance over both deep learning and other machine learning-based methods.

[1]  Danielle J. Harvey,et al.  The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative phase 2: Increasing the length, breadth, and depth of our understanding , 2015, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[2]  Yiming Ding,et al.  A Deep Learning Model to Predict a Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease by Using 18F-FDG PET of the Brain. , 2019, Radiology.

[3]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[4]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[5]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized cuts and image segmentation , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  Shantanu H. Joshi,et al.  Brain connectivity and novel network measures for Alzheimer's disease classification , 2015, Neurobiology of Aging.

[7]  Pierre Vandergheynst,et al.  Wavelets on Graphs via Spectral Graph Theory , 2009, ArXiv.

[8]  W. Klunk,et al.  Regional amyloid burden and intrinsic connectivity networks in cognitively normal elderly subjects. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  THE HUMAN CONNECTOME: A COMPLEX NETWORK , 2011, Schizophrenia Research.

[10]  A. Toga,et al.  Connectopathy in ageing and dementia. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  S. Resnick,et al.  Detection of prodromal Alzheimer's disease via pattern classification of magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, Neurobiology of Aging.

[12]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Locally linear embedding (LLE) for MRI based Alzheimer's disease classification , 2013, NeuroImage.

[13]  R. Woods,et al.  Cortical change in Alzheimer's disease detected with a disease-specific population-based brain atlas. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized Cuts and Image Segmentation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Altered resting state networks in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease: An fMRI study , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Efstathios D. Gennatas,et al.  Divergent network connectivity changes in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data Representation , 2003, Neural Computation.

[18]  Wenbin Li,et al.  Enriched white matter connectivity networks for accurate identification of MCI patients , 2011, NeuroImage.

[19]  D. Shen,et al.  Discriminant analysis of longitudinal cortical thickness changes in Alzheimer's disease using dynamic and network features , 2012, Neurobiology of Aging.

[20]  Jongbum Seo,et al.  Connectivity analysis of normal and mild cognitive impairment patients based on FDG and PiB-PET images , 2015, Neuroscience Research.

[21]  Xavier Bresson,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filtering , 2016, NIPS.

[22]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[23]  Tuo Zhang,et al.  Inferring Group-Wise Consistent Multimodal Brain Networks via Multi-View Spectral Clustering , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Seong-Whan Lee,et al.  Hierarchical feature representation and multimodal fusion with deep learning for AD/MCI diagnosis , 2014, NeuroImage.

[25]  Pascal Frossard,et al.  The emerging field of signal processing on graphs: Extending high-dimensional data analysis to networks and other irregular domains , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[26]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Identification of MCI individuals using structural and functional connectivity networks , 2012, NeuroImage.

[27]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  Graph-theory based parcellation of functional subunits in the brain from resting-state fMRI data , 2010, NeuroImage.

[28]  Moo K. Chung,et al.  Spatially augmented LPboosting for AD classification with evaluations on the ADNI dataset , 2009, NeuroImage.