Recognizing trade‐offs in multi‐objective land management

As natural resource management and conservation goals expand and evolve, practitioners and policy makers are increasingly seeking options that optimize benefits among multiple, often contradictory objectives. Here, we describe a simple approach for quantifying the consequences of alternative management options in terms of benefits and trade-offs among multiple objectives. We examine two long-term forest management experiments that span several decades of stand (forest tree community) development and identify substantial trade-offs among carbon cycling and ecological complexity objectives. In addition to providing improved understanding of the long-term consequences of various management options, the results of these experiments show that positive benefits resulting from some management options are often associated with large trade-offs among individual objectives. The approach to understanding benefits and trade-offs presented here provides a simple yet flexible framework for quantitatively assessing the ...

[1]  C. Messier,et al.  A Critique of Silviculture , 2008 .

[2]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[3]  A. Kirilenko,et al.  Climate change impacts on forestry , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  S. Fraver,et al.  Forest management for mitigation and adaptation to climate change: Insights from long-term silviculture experiments , 2011 .

[5]  J. Canadell,et al.  Managing Forests for Climate Change Mitigation , 2008, Science.

[6]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience , 2003 .

[7]  JeriLynn E. Peck,et al.  Characterizing structural conditions in mature managed red pine: Spatial dependency of metrics and adequacy of plot size , 2009 .

[8]  S. Hamburg,et al.  Forest carbon storage: ecology, management, and policy , 2010 .

[9]  M. Álvarez,et al.  Tradeoffs among ecosystem benefits: an analysis framework in the evaluation of forest management alternatives. , 2009 .

[10]  S. Stephens,et al.  Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  Leon S. Lasdon,et al.  GROUP DECISION MAKING IN WATER RESOURCES PLANNING USING MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[12]  John E. Hunt,et al.  Ecosystem service and biodiversity trade-offs in two woody successions , 2011 .

[13]  Pete Bettinger,et al.  The Key Literature of, and Trends in, Forest-Level Management Planning in North America, 1950–2001 , 2004 .

[14]  W. Collins,et al.  Global climate projections , 2007 .

[15]  B. Palik,et al.  A comparison of thinning methods in red pine: consequences for stand-level growth and tree diameter , 2009 .

[16]  Susan Craw,et al.  Combining deliberative and computer-based methods for multi-objective land-use planning , 2006 .

[17]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  ECOSYSTEM CONSEQUENCES OF BIODIVERSITY LOSS: THE EVOLUTION OF A PARADIGM , 2002 .

[18]  G. Bonan Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[19]  Tron Eid,et al.  An evaluation of different diameter diversity indices based on criteria related to forest management planning , 2006 .

[20]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  A Call to Action for Conserving Biological Diversity in the Face of Climate Change , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[21]  S. Fraver,et al.  A new method for evaluating forest thinning: growth dominance in managed Pinus resinosa stands , 2010 .

[22]  S. Fraver,et al.  Thinning method and intensity influence long-term mortality trends in a red pine forest , 2010 .

[23]  J. B. Ruhl,et al.  The Tragedy of Ecosystem Services , 2008 .

[24]  T. Spies,et al.  Cumulative ecological and socioeconomic effects of forest policies in coastal Oregon. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[25]  J. Hagan,et al.  An index to identify late-successional forest in temperate and boreal zones , 2007 .

[26]  N. T. Hobbs,et al.  Ecological Principles and Guidelines for Managing the Use of Land , 2000 .

[27]  A. D’Amato,et al.  Growth, yield, and structure of extended rotation Pinus resinosa stands in Minnesota, USA , 2010 .

[28]  Christopher S. Galik,et al.  Forest Management Solutions for Mitigating Climate Change in the United States , 2008, Journal of Forestry.

[29]  R. Birdsey,et al.  National-Scale Biomass Estimators for United States Tree Species , 2003, Forest Science.

[30]  John Bolte,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF MULTIPLE‐OBJECTIVE DECISION‐MAKING METHODS FOR WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANNING 1 , 2002 .

[31]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms , 2006 .

[32]  M. Loreau Linking biodiversity and ecosystems: towards a unifying ecological theory , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  S. McNaughton Diversity and Stability of Ecological Communities: A Comment on the Role of Empiricism in Ecology , 1977, The American Naturalist.