Locality and Accessibility in Wh-Questions

Even in relatively configurational languages, such as English, speakers frequently have a choice between different constituent orders. Many of these word order variations have been linked to complexity (Hawkins 2005; inter alia). For example, heavy-NP shift is more likely if the shifted NP is more complex than the NP it shifts over (Wasow 1997). Other cases of word order variations, however, have not been considered in these terms. The choice between different wh-phrase orders, as in (1), has been said to be determined by (categorical) grammatical constraints, such as Superiority (Kuno and Robinson 1972, Chomsky 1973; inter alia).

[1]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Conditions on transformations , 1971 .

[2]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  Syntax and semantics of questions , 1977 .

[3]  M. Gernsbacher Mechanisms that improve referential access , 1989, Cognition.

[4]  Alice G. B. ter Meulen,et al.  The representation of (in)definiteness , 1989 .

[5]  Mira Ariel Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .

[6]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[7]  M. Kutas,et al.  Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Sorace,et al.  MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION OF LINGUISTIC ACCEPTABILITY , 1996 .

[9]  Thomas Wasow,et al.  Remarks on grammatical weight , 1997, Language Variation and Change.

[10]  Robert Kluender,et al.  On the distinction between strong and weak islands: a processing perspective , 1998 .

[11]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Image, language, brain , 2000 .

[12]  E. Gibson The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[13]  D. Pesetsky Phrasal Movement and Its Kin , 2000 .

[14]  Wilbert Spooren,et al.  Text representation : linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects , 2001 .

[15]  Mira Ariel Accessibility theory: An overview , 2001 .

[16]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Processing “d-Linked” Phrases , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[17]  Tessa C. Warren,et al.  The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity , 2002, Cognition.

[18]  Frank Keller,et al.  Linguistic Complexity , Locality and Resumption , 2003 .

[19]  Gisbert Fanselow,et al.  Effects of Processing Difficulty on Judgments of Acceptability , 2004 .

[20]  J. Hawkins Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[21]  Sam Featherston,et al.  Universals and grammaticality: wh-constraints in German and English , 2005 .

[22]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Effects of NP type in reading cleft sentences in English , 2005 .

[23]  C. Clifton,et al.  Amnestying Superiority Violations: Processing Multiple Questions , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[24]  Frank Keller,et al.  Linear Optimality Theory as a Model of Gradience in Grammar , 2006 .

[25]  Veneeta Dayal Multiple‐Wh‐Questions , 2007 .