Learning evaluation of ultrasound image segmentation using combined measures

Objective evaluation of medical image segmentation is one of the important steps for proving its validity and clinical applicability. Although there are many researches presenting segmentation methods on medical image, while with few studying the evaluation methods on their results, this paper presents a learning evaluation method with combined measures to make it as close as possible to the clinicians’ judgment. This evaluation method is more quantitative and precise for the clinical diagnose. In our experiment, the same data sets include 120 segmentation results of lumen-intima boundary (LIB) and media-adventitia boundary (MAB) of carotid ultrasound images respectively. And the 15 measures of goodness method and discrepancy method are used to evaluate the different segmentation results alone. Furthermore, the experimental results showed that compared with the discrepancy method, the accuracy with the measures of goodness method is poor. Then, by combining with the measures of two methods, the average accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 2 segmentation groups are higher than 93% and 0.9 respectively. And the results of MAB are better than LIB, which proved that this novel method can effectively evaluate the segmentation results. Moreover, it lays the foundation for the non-supervised segmentation evaluation system.

[1]  M. Neubert,et al.  Enhanced evaluation of image segmentation results , 2010 .

[2]  Noel E. O'Connor,et al.  A comparative evaluation of interactive segmentation algorithms , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Image segmentation evaluation: A survey of unsupervised methods , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[4]  Amir-Masoud Eftekhari-Moghadam,et al.  A new evaluation measure for color image segmentation based on genetic programming approach , 2013, Image Vis. Comput..

[5]  Xiaoqian Jiang,et al.  Flexible methods for segmentation evaluation: results from CT-based luggage screening. , 2014, Journal of X-ray science and technology.

[6]  Martial Hebert,et al.  A Measure for Objective Evaluation of Image Segmentation Algorithms , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Workshops.

[7]  N. Senthilkumaran,et al.  Image Segmentation - A Survey of Soft Computing Approaches , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and Computing.

[8]  Y. J. Zhang,et al.  A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Hui Zhang,et al.  A co-evaluation framework for improving segmentation evaluation , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Song Wang,et al.  New benchmark for image segmentation evaluation , 2007, J. Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Toward Objective Evaluation of Image Segmentation Algorithms , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Andrius Usinskas,et al.  A SURVEY OF GENETIC ALGORITHMS APPLICATIONS FOR IMAGE ENHANCEMENT AND SEGMENTATION , 2007 .