Intradisciplinary differences in database coverage and the consequences for bibliometric research

Bibliographic databases (including databases based on open access) are routinely used for bibliometric research. The value of a specific database depends to a large extent on the coverage of the discipline(s) under study. A number of studies have determined the coverage of databases in specific disciplines focusing on interdisciplinary differences; however, little is known about the potential existence of intradisciplinary differences in database coverage. Focusing on intradisciplinary differences, the article documents large database-coverage differences within two disciplines (economics and psychology). The point extends to include both the uneven coverage of specialties and research traditions. The implications for bibliometric research are discussed, and precautions which need to be taken are outlined. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Pranas Zunde,et al.  Structural models of complex information sources , 1971, Inf. Storage Retr..

[2]  S. Gosling,et al.  An empirical analysis of trends in psychology. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[3]  David N. Laband.  Contribution, attribution and the allocation of intellectual property rights: economics versus agricultural economics , 2002 .

[4]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance , 2002, Scientometrics.

[5]  David P. Hamilton.  Research papers: who's uncited now? , 1991, Science.

[6]  Christina Courtright,et al.  Context in information behavior research , 2007 .

[7]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Quality judgments of journals as indicators of research performance in the humanities and the social and behavioral sciences , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Delivery, Management and Access Model for E_prints and Open Access Journals , 2004 .

[9]  Christopher B. Barrett,et al.  Subdiscipline-Specific Journal Rankings: Whither Applied Economics? , 1998 .

[10]  Alireza Noruzi.  Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes , 2005 .

[11]  Zvjezdana Bencetic Klaic,et al.  Croatian scientific publications in top journals according to the Science Citation Indexfor the 1980–2000 Period , 2004, Scientometrics.

[12]  Neil B. Metcalfe,et al.  Journal impact factors , 1995, Nature.

[13]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: a study of sociology , 1997, J. Documentation.

[14]  David P. Hamilton.  Publishing by--and for?--the numbers. , 1990, Science.

[15]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  The Editors and Authors of Economics Journals: A Case of Institutional Oligopoly? , 1999 .

[16]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[17]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Google Scholar citations and Google Web-URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis , 2007 .

[18]  Alvin,et al.  Thesaurus of psychological index terms, 7th ed. , 1994 .

[19]  Charlene Kellsey,et al.  Citation Analysis for Collection Development: A Comparative Study of Eight Humanities Fields1 , 2005, The Library Quarterly.

[20]  Lei Wang,et al.  Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science , 2006, Biomedical digital libraries.

[21]  María Bordons,et al.  Comparison of research team activity in two biomedical fields , 1997, Scientometrics.

[22]  Jane M. Russell,et al.  World distribution of social science journals:A view from the periphery , 2001, Scientometrics.

[23]  Berenika M. Webster,et al.  Polish Sociology Citation Index as an example of usage of national citation indexes in scientometric analysis of social sciences , 1998, J. Inf. Sci..

[24]  Concepción S. Wilson,et al.  Informetric studies using databases: Opportunities and challenges , 2003, Scientometrics.

[25]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and beha vioural sciences: A comparative study , 1989, Scientometrics.

[26]  Concepción S. Wilson,et al.  The scatter of documents over databases in different subject domains: How many databases are needed? , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  L. Laudan.  Science as Problem-Solving. (Book Reviews: Progress and Its Problems. Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth) , 1977 .

[28]  William H. Walters,et al.  Bibliographic index coverage of a multidisciplinary field , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  M. Kocher,et al.  The Institutional Concentration of Authors in Top Journals of Economics during the Last Two Decades , 2001 .

[30]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not Just a Matter of Time: Field Differences and the Shaping of Electronic Media , 1999 .

[31]  Hans-Dieter Daniel,et al.  Data sources for performing citation analysis: an overview , 2008, J. Documentation.

[32]  Zvjezdana Bencetiklai,et al.  Croatian scientific publications in top journals according to the Science Citation Index for the 1980-2000 period , 2004 .

[33]  Julian Warner,et al.  The Role of monographs in scholarly Communication: an Empirical Study of Philosophy, Sociology and Economics , 1996, J. Documentation.

[34]  K. Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2001 .

[35]  H. Moed.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management) , 2005 .

[36]  U. Schmidt,et al.  Are top journals biased against eating disorders topics? , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[37]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact , 2005, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..

[38]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  Content Evaluation of Databases. , 1997 .