Organizational Communication and Conflict Management Systems

Abstract The purpose of the present article is to examine the prevailing model of systematic organizational conflict management from an organizational communicative perspective and to suggest directions for improvement. Particularly the model of conflict management system (CMS) is examined at the macro-level from the novel theoretical perspective of social complexity augmented with an interpretive view of organizational communication. Specifically two models – the dual function of communication and the arena model – are utilized to illustrate weaknesses and points of development in traditional CMS thinking. CMS was found to represent a rather limited vision of contemporary conflict management. It is rooted in a mechanistic view of organizational communication, which, we assert, is problematic from the organizational conflict management perspective, both theoretically and practically. The differences between CMS and social complexity approaches are identified, and a fresh framework for strategic conflict management is introduced.

[1]  Joel P. Bowman,et al.  Modeling the Communication Process: The Map is Not the Territory , 1987 .

[2]  Robin L. Pinkley,et al.  Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. , 1990 .

[3]  Corinne Bendersky,et al.  Organizational Dispute Resolution Systems: a Complementarities Model , 2003 .

[4]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Conflict and negotiation. , 1987 .

[5]  R. Walton,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. , 1966 .

[6]  Ronald L. Seeber,et al.  Emerging Systems for Managing Workplace Conflict: Lessons from American Corporations for Managers and Dispute Resolution Professionals , 2003 .

[7]  Carol Watson,et al.  Managers as negotiators: A test of power versus gender as predictors of feelings, behavior, and outcomes , 1996 .

[8]  B. Ruben Communication and Conflict: A System-Theoretic Perspective. , 1978 .

[9]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Models of conflict, negotiation and third party intervention: A review and synthesis. , 1992 .

[10]  C. Cooper,et al.  Conflict at work and individual well-being , 2003 .

[11]  Pekka Aula,et al.  Strategic Reputation Management: Towards A Company of Good , 2008 .

[12]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[13]  Tim O'Sullivan,et al.  Key Concepts in Communication and Cultural Studies , 1993 .

[14]  Jack A. Goncalo,et al.  The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: A study in two countries , 2004 .

[15]  Roland Castellanos A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups , 2007 .

[16]  W DreudeC.K.,et al.  Conflict at work and individual well-being , 2004 .

[17]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Revisiting Metaphors of Organizational Communication , 2006 .

[18]  L. Pondy,et al.  Toward an "Intent" Model of Conflict Management Among Principal Parties , 1977 .

[19]  R. Bush,et al.  The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict , 2004 .

[20]  Jason Brownlee,et al.  Complex adaptive systems , 2007 .

[21]  H. Engen The New Formalism. , 1971 .

[22]  C. E. Puente,et al.  The Essence of Chaos , 1995 .

[23]  Susan M. Meyer Organizational Response to Conflict: Future Conflict and Work Outcomes. , 2004 .

[24]  K. Jehn A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[25]  J. Brett Managing organizational conflict. , 1984 .

[26]  D. Tjosvold The conflict‐positive organization: it depends upon us , 2008 .

[27]  J. Holland Complex adaptive systems , 1992 .

[28]  Qin Zhang,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice , 2006 .

[29]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  The Chaos Frontier: Creative Strategic Control for Business , 1991 .

[30]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  An Analysis of Conflict in Decision-Making Groups , 1954 .

[31]  Chris Goldspink,et al.  Organizations as self-organizing and sustaining systems: a complex and autopoietic systems perspective , 2003, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[32]  Allen C. Amason Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[33]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  The Sage handbook of organizational communication : advances in theory, research, and methods , 2001 .

[34]  Karl A. Slaikeu,et al.  Controlling the Costs of Conflict: How to Design a System for Your Organization , 1998 .

[35]  Leonard C. Hawes,et al.  A critique of assumptions underlying the study of communication in conflict , 1973 .

[36]  Stephen B. Goldberg,et al.  Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict , 1993 .

[37]  Pekka Aula CHAOS AND THE DOUBLE FUNCTION OF COMMUNICATION , 1996 .

[38]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Working Through Conflict: Strategies for Relationships, Groups, and Organizations , 2012 .

[39]  Cathy A. Costantino,et al.  Designing Conflict Management Systems: A Guide to Creating Productive and Healthy Organizations , 1995 .

[40]  M. Afzalur Rahim,et al.  Toward a Theory of Managing Organizational Conflict , 2002 .

[41]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1987 .