Fundamental Frequency, Intensity, and Vowel Duration Characteristics Related to Perception of Cantonese Alaryngeal Speech

Fundamental frequency (F₀), F₀ contours, vowel duration, and intensity associated with Cantonese alaryngeal speech, and their relation to the perception of meaning were studied. Thirty adult male native Cantonese speakers participated in the study: 10 esophageal, 10 electrolaryngeal, and 10 laryngeal speakers. Results indicated that perceptually, listeners were able to identify what the Cantonese esophageal speakers were saying, particularly for words associated with high-level, low-falling and high-rising tonal contours. Acoustic analysis of the speech signals of the esophageal speakers indicated that intensity and durational data did not contribute to the perception of meaning. The F₀ contours appeared to be the acoustic cues associated with the signal that contributed most to the perception of meaning.

[1]  Ronald J. Baken,et al.  Clinical measurement of speech and voice , 1987 .

[2]  Roy K. Sedge,et al.  Speech Science Primer: Physiology, Acoustics, and Perception of Speech , 1980 .

[3]  J. Gandour,et al.  Influence of Postvocalic Consonants on Vowel Duration in Esophageal Speech , 1980, Language and speech.

[4]  Y. Horii,et al.  Long-time spectral and intensity characteristics of esophageal speech. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M.L. Ng,et al.  Perceptions of Tonal Changes in Normal Laryngeal, Esophageal, and Artificial Laryngeal Male Cantonese Speakers , 1998, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[6]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[7]  J. Noll,et al.  Relationship of selected acoustic variables to judgments of esophageal speech , 1969 .

[8]  B Weinberg,et al.  Vowel duration characteristics of esophageal speech. , 1976, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  N. Isshiki,et al.  VOCAL AND AIR USE CHARACTERISTICS OF A SUPERIOR MALE ESOPHAGEAL SPEAKER. , 1965, Folia phoniatrica.

[10]  M Hyman,et al.  Relationship of Acoustic Parameters and Perceptual Ratings of Esophageal Speech , 1975, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  M. Ng,et al.  Speech performance of adult cantonese-speaking laryngectomees using different types of alaryngeal phonation. , 1997, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[12]  M. Singer,et al.  A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[13]  T. Shipp,et al.  Frequency, duration, and perceptual measures in relation to judgments of alaryngeal speech acceptability. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  C A van Hasselt,et al.  Speech intelligibility in tone language (Chinese) laryngectomy speakers. , 1994, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[15]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English , 1960 .

[16]  T. Ching,et al.  Communication of lexical tones in Cantonese alaryngeal speech. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  Lawrence J. Raphael,et al.  Speech Science Primer: Physiology, Acoustics, and Perception of Speech , 1980 .

[18]  C. Berlin CLINICAL MEASUREMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL SPEECH. 3. PERFORMANCE OF NON-BIASED GROUPS. , 1965, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[19]  B Weinberg,et al.  Tone in Thai alaryngeal speech. , 1988, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[20]  D. Hinkle,et al.  Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .