Symmetry in External Work (SEW): A Novel Method of Quantifying Gait Differences Between Prosthetic Feet

Unilateral transtibial amputees (TTAs) show subtle gait variations while using different prosthetic feet. These variations have not been detected consistently with previous experimental measures. We introduce a novel measure called Symmetry in External Work (SEW) for quantifying kinetic gait differences between prosthetic feet. External work is the result of changes in kinetic and potential energy of body center of mass (CoM). SEW is computed by integrating vertical ground reaction forces obtained using F-scan in-sole sensors. Since various prosthetic feet have different designs, we hypothesized that SEW will vary with the type of foot used. This hypothesis was tested with a single unilateral TTA using four prosthetic feet (Proprio, Trias+, Seattle Lite and SACH). The Proprio (mean symmetry 94.5% ± 1.1%) and the Trias+ (92.1% ± 2.5%) feet exhibited higher symmetry between the intact and prosthetic limbs, as compared to the Seattle (67.8% ± 19.3%) and SACH (35.7% ± 11.1%) feet. There was also a good agreement in vertical CoM excursion between the intact foot and prosthetic feet with heel-toe foot plate designs. Results indicate that SEW measure may be a viable method to detect kinetic differences between prosthetic feet and could have clinical applications because of relatively low cost instrumentation and minimal subject intervention.

[1]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Energy storage and return prostheses: does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  A. Kuo,et al.  Comparison of kinematic and kinetic methods for computing the vertical motion of the body center of mass during walking. , 2004, Human movement science.

[3]  G. Cavagna Force platforms as ergometers. , 1975, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  Andrew H. Hansen Scientific Methods to Determine Functional Performance of Prosthetic Ankle-Foot Systems , 2005 .

[5]  Steven A. Gard,et al.  Use of Quantitative Gait Analysis for the Evaluation of Prosthetic Walking Performance , 2006 .

[6]  H. Cochrane,et al.  Lower limb amputation Part 3: Prosthetics - a 10 year literature review , 2001, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[7]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive Dynamic Walking , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  J. M. Carlson,et al.  Functional Limitations From Pain Caused by Repetitive Loading on the Skin: A Review and Discussion for Practitioners, With New Data for Limiting Friction Loads , 2006 .

[9]  Rodger Kram,et al.  Simultaneous positive and negative external mechanical work in human walking. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  M J Mueller,et al.  Generalizability of in-shoe peak pressure measures using the F-scan system. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  C. Detrembleur,et al.  The 3-D motion of the centre of gravity of the human body during level walking. II. Lower limb amputees. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  S. Gard,et al.  What Determines the Vertical Displacement of the Body During Normal Walking? , 2001 .

[13]  G. Cavagna,et al.  External work in walking. , 1963, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  George N S Marinakis,et al.  Interlimb symmetry of traumatic unilateral transtibial amputees wearing two different prosthetic feet in the early rehabilitation stage. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  J. Donelan,et al.  Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is a major determinant of the metabolic cost of human walking. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  S. Solomonidis,et al.  Evaluation of the gait analysis FSCAN pressure system: clinical tool or toy? , 2000 .

[17]  Klaas Postema,et al.  A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower-limb prosthesis. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  D. Childress,et al.  The Effective Foot Length Ratio: A Potential Tool for Characterization and Evaluation of Prosthetic Feet , 2004 .

[19]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  The role of ankle plantar flexor muscle work during walking. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[20]  R. Gailey,et al.  Review of secondary physical conditions associated with lower-limb amputation and long-term prosthesis use. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  J Gibson,et al.  Lower limb amputation. , 2001, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[22]  N C Heglund,et al.  Ergometric evaluation of pathological gait. , 1983, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[23]  Arthur D Kuo,et al.  Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  M. Coleman,et al.  The simplest walking model: stability, complexity, and scaling. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  Andy Ruina,et al.  Energetic Consequences of Walking Like an Inverted Pendulum: Step-to-Step Transitions , 2005, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[26]  D. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  K. Postema,et al.  Prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.