Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Etoposide and Platinum as First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III KEYNOTE-604 Study.

PURPOSE Pembrolizumab monotherapy has shown antitumor activity in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-604 study compared pembrolizumab plus etoposide and platinum (EP) with placebo plus EP for patients with previously untreated extensive-stage (ES) SCLC. METHODS Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks or saline placebo for up to 35 cycles plus 4 cycles of EP. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST version 1.1, blinded central review) and overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population. Objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response were secondary end points. Prespecified efficacy boundaries were one-sided P = .0048 for PFS and .0128 for OS. RESULTS Of the 453 participants, 228 were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus EP and 225 to placebo plus EP. Pembrolizumab plus EP significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.91; P = .0023). Twelve-month PFS estimates were 13.6% with pembrolizumab plus EP and 3.1% with placebo plus EP. Although pembrolizumab plus EP prolonged OS, the significance threshold was not met (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98; P = .0164). Twenty-four-month OS estimates were 22.5% and 11.2%, respectively. ORR was 70.6% in the pembrolizumab plus EP group and 61.8% in the placebo plus EP group; the estimated proportion of responders remaining in response at 12 months was 19.3% and 3.3%, respectively. In the pembrolizumab plus EP and placebo plus EP groups, respectively, any-cause adverse events were grade 3-4 in 76.7% and 74.9%, grade 5 in 6.3% and 5.4%, and led to discontinuation of any drug in 14.8% and 6.3%. CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab plus EP significantly improved PFS compared with placebo plus EP as first-line therapy for patients with ES-SCLC. No unexpected toxicities were seen with pembrolizumab plus EP. These data support the benefit of pembrolizumab in ES-SCLC.

[1]  R. Hubbard,et al.  A systematic review of survival following anti-cancer treatment for small cell lung cancer. , 2020, Lung cancer.

[2]  D. Planchard,et al.  Pembrolizumab After Two or More Lines of Previous Therapy in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the KEYNOTE-028 and KEYNOTE-158 Studies. , 2019, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[3]  Young Hak Kim,et al.  Durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide versus platinum–etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[4]  A. Italiano,et al.  Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with select advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-158 , 2019, Annals of Oncology.

[5]  C. Rudin,et al.  Molecular subtypes of small cell lung cancer: a synthesis of human and mouse model data , 2019, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[6]  J. Lunceford,et al.  T-Cell-Inflamed Gene-Expression Profile, Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression, and Tumor Mutational Burden Predict Efficacy in Patients Treated With Pembrolizumab Across 20 Cancers: KEYNOTE-028. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  M. Hellmann,et al.  Third-Line Nivolumab Monotherapy in Recurrent SCLC: CheckMate 032 , 2018, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[8]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non–Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  A. Mansfield,et al.  First‐Line Atezolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Extensive‐Stage Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. Lunceford,et al.  Clinical Utility of the Combined Positive Score for Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression and the Approval of Pembrolizumab for Treatment of Gastric Cancer. , 2018, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  S. Novello,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  A. Farago,et al.  Current standards for clinical management of small cell lung cancer. , 2018, Translational lung cancer research.

[13]  D. Morgensztern,et al.  Treatment advances in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) , 2017, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[14]  J. Li,et al.  Survival changes in patients with small cell lung cancer and disparities between different sexes, socioeconomic statuses and ages , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[15]  C. Rudin,et al.  Medians and Milestones in Describing the Path to Cancer Cures: Telling "Tails". , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[16]  C. Rudin,et al.  Small cell and neuroendocrine tumors of the lung , 2015 .

[17]  Yoshiaki Uyama,et al.  Moving beyond the hazard ratio in quantifying the between-group difference in survival analysis. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Multiple Testing in Group Sequential Trials Using Graphical Approaches , 2013 .

[19]  R. Herbst,et al.  Small-cell lung cancer: prognostic factors and changing treatment over 15 years. , 2012, Clinical lung cancer.

[20]  Edward L Spitznagel,et al.  Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.