Standing-Gradient Osmotic Flow A mechanism for coupling of water and solute transport in epithelia

At the ultrastructural level, epithelia performing solute-linked water transport possess long, narrow channels open at one end and closed at the other, which may constitute the fluid transport route (e.g., lateral intercellular spaces, basal infoldings, intracellular canaliculi, and brush-border microvilli). Active solute transport into such folded structures would establish standing osmotic gradients, causing a progressive approach to osmotic equilibrium along the channel's length. The behavior of a simple standing-gradient flow system has therefore been analyzed mathematically because of its potential physiological significance. The osmolarity of the fluid emerging from the channel's open end depends upon five parameters: channel length, radius, and water permeability, and solute transport rate and diffusion coefficient. For ranges of values of these parameters encountered experimentally in epithelia, the emergent osmolarity is found by calculation to range from isotonic to a few times isotonic; i.e., the range encountered in epithelial absorbates and secretions. The transported fluid becomes more isotonic as channel radius or solute diffusion coefficient is decreased, or as channel length or water permeability is increased. Given appropriate parameters, a standing-gradient system can yield hypertonic fluids whose osmolarities are virtually independent of transport rate over a wide range, as in distal tubule and avian salt gland. The results suggest that water-to-solute coupling in epithelia is due to the ultrastructural geometry of the transport route.

[1]  H. O. Wheeler,et al.  COUPLED TRANSPORT OF SOLUTE AND WATER ACROSS RABBIT GALLBLADDER EPITHELIUM. , 1964, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[2]  J. Diamond The Mechanism of Isotonic Water Transport , 1964, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  B. Schmidt-nielsen,et al.  Renal ultrastructure and excretion of salt and water by three terrestrial lizards. , 1966, American Journal of Physiology.

[4]  E. Wright,et al.  Streaming potentials in the rat small intestine , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Anthony Ralston,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Digital Computers , 1960 .

[6]  K. Schmidt-Nielsen,et al.  The Salt‐Secreting Gland of Marine Birds , 1960, Circulation.

[7]  J. Diamond The mechanism of solute transport by the gall‐bladder , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  B. Schmidt-nielsen,et al.  Ultrastructure of the crocodile kidney (Crocodylus acutus) with special reference to electrolyte and fluid transport , 1967, Journal of morphology.

[9]  D A Goldstein,et al.  The flow of solute and solvent across a two-membrane system. , 1963, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  J. M. Tormey Significance of the Histochemical Demonstration of ATPase in Epithelia Noted for Active Transport , 1966, Nature.

[11]  A. K. Solomon,et al.  WATER FLOW THROUGH FROG GASTRIC MUCOSA , 1956, The Journal of general physiology.

[12]  P. Bentley DIRECTIONAL DIFFERENCES IN THE PERMEABILITY TO WATER OF THE ISOLATED URINARY BLADDER OF THE TOAD, BUFO MARINUS , 1961 .

[13]  K. Kunz,et al.  Numerical analysis , 1957 .

[14]  J. Diamond,et al.  The Ultrastructural Route of Fluid Transport in Rabbit Gall Bladder , 1967, The Journal of general physiology.

[15]  J. Dainty,et al.  An examination of the evidence for membrane pores in frog skin , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  G. Auricchio,et al.  On the Role of Omlotic Water Transport in the Secretion of the Aqueous Huniour1 , 1959 .

[17]  A. K. Solomon,et al.  Single proximal tubules of Necturus kidney. IV. Dependence of H20 movement on osmotic gradients. , 1959, The American journal of physiology.

[18]  P. Curran,et al.  A Model System for Biological Water Transport , 1962, Nature.