Optimal machining conditions for turning Ti-6Al-4V using response surface methodology
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Z. M. Wang,et al. Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review , 1997 .
[2] R. Komanduri,et al. New observations on the mechanism of chip formation when machining titanium alloys , 1981 .
[3] Jeffrey D. Thiele,et al. Effect of cutting edge geometry and workpiece hardness on surface generation in the finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel , 1999 .
[4] J. I. Nanavati,et al. Optimisation of machining parameters for turning operations based on response surface methodology , 2013 .
[5] Inderpreet Singh Ahuja,et al. Influence of cutting parameters on tool wear and surface roughness in hard turning of AISI H11 tool steel using ceramic tools , 2012 .
[6] Marc Thomas,et al. An experimental design for surface roughness and built‐up edge formation in lathe dry turning , 1997 .
[7] V. C. Venkatesh,et al. Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel , 2004 .
[8] Nikos Tsourveloudis,et al. Predictive Modeling of the Ti6Al4V Alloy Surface Roughness , 2010, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..
[9] Imtiaz Ahmed Choudhury,et al. Surface roughness prediction in the turning of high-strength steel by factorial design of experiments , 1997 .
[10] K. Palanikumar,et al. Surface Roughness Analysis in Machining of Titanium Alloy , 2008 .
[11] M. Donachie. Titanium: A Technical Guide , 1988 .
[12] Biswanath Doloi,et al. Force prediction model of Zirconia Toughened Alumina (ZTA) inserts in hard turning of AISI 4340 steel using response surface methodology , 2012 .
[13] H. Hong,et al. Machinability of steels and titanium alloys under lubrication , 1993 .
[14] M. Yallese,et al. Application of response surface methodology for determining cutting force model in turning hardened AISI H11 hot work tool steel , 2011 .
[15] Suleyman Neseli,et al. Optimization of tool geometry parameters for turning operations based on the response surface methodology , 2011 .