Optimal machining conditions for turning Ti-6Al-4V using response surface methodology

Machining titanium is one of ever-increasing magnitude problems due to its characteristics such as low thermal conductivity, modulus of elasticity and work hardening. The efficient titanium alloy machining involves a proper selection of process parameters to minimize the tangential force (Fz) and surface roughness (Ra). In the present work, the performance of PVD/TiAlN coated carbide inserts was investigated using response surface methodology (RSM) for turning Ti-6Al-4V. The effects of process parameters such as speed (v), feed (f), depth of cut (d) and back rake angle (γy) on Fz and Ra were investigated. The experimental plan used for four factors and three levels was designed based on face centered, central composite design (CCD). The experimental results indicated that Fz increased with the increase in d, f and decreased with the increase in v and γy, whereas Ra decreased with the increase in v and γy, and increased with d and v. The goodness of fit of the regression equations and model fits (R2) for Fz and Ra were found to be 0.968 and 0.970, which demonstrated that it was an effective model. A confirmation test was also conducted in order to verify the correctness of the model.

[1]  Z. M. Wang,et al.  Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review , 1997 .

[2]  R. Komanduri,et al.  New observations on the mechanism of chip formation when machining titanium alloys , 1981 .

[3]  Jeffrey D. Thiele,et al.  Effect of cutting edge geometry and workpiece hardness on surface generation in the finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel , 1999 .

[4]  J. I. Nanavati,et al.  Optimisation of machining parameters for turning operations based on response surface methodology , 2013 .

[5]  Inderpreet Singh Ahuja,et al.  Influence of cutting parameters on tool wear and surface roughness in hard turning of AISI H11 tool steel using ceramic tools , 2012 .

[6]  Marc Thomas,et al.  An experimental design for surface roughness and built‐up edge formation in lathe dry turning , 1997 .

[7]  V. C. Venkatesh,et al.  Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel , 2004 .

[8]  Nikos Tsourveloudis,et al.  Predictive Modeling of the Ti6Al4V Alloy Surface Roughness , 2010, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[9]  Imtiaz Ahmed Choudhury,et al.  Surface roughness prediction in the turning of high-strength steel by factorial design of experiments , 1997 .

[10]  K. Palanikumar,et al.  Surface Roughness Analysis in Machining of Titanium Alloy , 2008 .

[11]  M. Donachie Titanium: A Technical Guide , 1988 .

[12]  Biswanath Doloi,et al.  Force prediction model of Zirconia Toughened Alumina (ZTA) inserts in hard turning of AISI 4340 steel using response surface methodology , 2012 .

[13]  H. Hong,et al.  Machinability of steels and titanium alloys under lubrication , 1993 .

[14]  M. Yallese,et al.  Application of response surface methodology for determining cutting force model in turning hardened AISI H11 hot work tool steel , 2011 .

[15]  Suleyman Neseli,et al.  Optimization of tool geometry parameters for turning operations based on the response surface methodology , 2011 .