A new hypothesis to explain the coexistence of n species in the presence of a single resource.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Hubbell,et al. Single-nutrient microbial competition: qualitative agreement between experimental and theoretically forecast outcomes. , 1980, Science.
[2] David Angeli,et al. A Feedback Perspective for Chemostat Models with Crowding Effects , 2003, POSTA.
[3] R. Arditi,et al. Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-Dependence , 1989 .
[4] R. McGehee,et al. Coexistence of species competing for shared resources. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.
[5] G. E. Hutchinson,et al. The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .
[6] Alain Rapaport,et al. Persistence in ecological models of competition for a single resource , 2005 .
[7] A. Novick,et al. Experiments with the Chemostat on spontaneous mutations of bacteria. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[8] Marten Scheffer,et al. Why plankton communities have no equilibrium: solutions to the paradox , 2004, Hydrobiologia.
[9] Wolf M. Mooij,et al. Does “supersaturated coexistence” resolve the “paradox of the plankton”? , 2001 .
[10] R. McGehee,et al. Some mathematical problems concerning the ecological principle of competitive exclusion , 1977 .
[11] J. Monod,et al. Recherches sur la croissance des cultures bactériennes , 1942 .
[12] J. Huisman,et al. Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.
[13] Christian Jost,et al. Predator‐prey theory: hidden twins in ecology and microbiology , 2000 .
[14] C. Spicer,et al. The Theory of Bacterial Constant Growth Apparatus , 1955 .