Boundary effects on electrophoretic motion of colloidal spheres

An analysis is presented for electrophoretic motion of a charged non-conducting sphere in the proximity of rigid boundaries. An important assumption is that κ a → ∞, where a is the particle radius and κ is the Debye screening parameter. Three boundary configurations are considered: single flat wall, two parallel walls (slit), and a long circular tube. The boundary is assumed a perfect electrical insulator except when the applied field is directed perpendicular to a single wall, in which case the wall is assumed to have a uniform potential (perfect conductor). There are three basic effects causing the particle velocity to deviate from the value given by Smoluchowski's classic equation: first, a charge on the boundary causes electro-osmotic flow of the suspending fluid; secondly, the boundary alters the interaction between the particle and applied electric field; and, thirdly, the boundary enhances viscous retardation of the particle as it tries to move in response to the applied field. Using a method of reflections, we determine the particle velocity for a constant applied field in increasing powers of λ up to O (λ 6 ), where λ is the ratio of particle radius to distance from the boundary. Ignoring the O (λ 0 ) electro-osmotic effect, the first effect attributable to proximity of the boundary is O (λ 3 ) for all boundary configurations, and in cases when the applied field is parallel to the boundaries the electrophoretic velocity is proportional to ζ p − ζ w , the difference in zeta potential between the particle and boundary.

[1]  F. A. Morrison,et al.  Electrophoresis of a particle of arbitrary shape , 1970 .

[2]  J. S. Goldstein,et al.  The motion of bubbles in a vertical temperature gradient , 1959, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  R. J. Hunter,et al.  The electrophoretic mobility of large colloidal particles , 1981 .

[4]  Lee R. White,et al.  Electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle , 1978 .

[5]  D. Prieve,et al.  Motion of a particle generated by chemical gradients. Part 2. Electrolytes , 1982, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  R. G. Cox,et al.  The stokes translation of a particle of arbitrary shape along the axis of a circular cylinder , 1966 .

[7]  Howard Brenner,et al.  The Stokes resistance of a slightly deformed sphere , 1964 .

[8]  R. J. Hunter,et al.  Zeta Potential in Colloid Science , 1981 .

[9]  John L. Anderson,et al.  Effect of nonuniform zeta potential on particle movement in electric fields , 1985 .

[10]  J. Happel,et al.  Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics , 1965 .

[11]  A. Adamson Physical chemistry of surfaces , 1960 .

[12]  R. W. O'Brien The solution of the electrokinetic equations for colloidal particles with thin double layers , 1983 .

[13]  Movement of a semipermeable vesicle through an osmotic gradient , 1983 .

[14]  F. A. Morrison,et al.  Electrophoresis of an insulating sphere normal to a conducting plane , 1970 .

[15]  S. Levine,et al.  The discrete-ion effect in ionic double-layer theory , 1967 .

[16]  J. Happel,et al.  Viscous Flow in Multiparticle Systems) Motion of a Sphere in a Cylindrical Tube , 1954 .

[17]  H. Brenner The slow motion of a sphere through a viscous fluid towards a plane surface , 1961 .

[18]  C. P. Bean,et al.  Counting and Sizing of Submicron Particles by the Resistive Pulse Technique , 1970 .

[19]  Howard Brenner,et al.  The Stokes resistance of an arbitrary particleIV Arbitrary fields of flow , 1964 .