Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target

OBJECTIVE Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique to modify neural excitability. Using multi-array tDCS, we investigate the influence of inter-individually varying head tissue conductivity profiles on optimal electrode configurations for an auditory cortex stimulation. APPROACH In order to quantify the uncertainty of the optimal electrode configurations, multi-variate generalized polynomial chaos expansions of the model solutions are used based on uncertain conductivity profiles of the compartments skin, skull, gray matter, and white matter. Stochastic measures, probability density functions, and sensitivity of the quantities of interest are investigated for each electrode and the current density at the target with the resulting stimulation protocols visualized on the head surface. MAIN RESULTS We demonstrate that the optimized stimulation protocols are only comprised of a few active electrodes, with tolerable deviations in the stimulation amplitude of the anode. However, large deviations in the order of the uncertainty in the conductivity profiles could be noted in the stimulation protocol of the compensating cathodes. Regarding these main stimulation electrodes, the stimulation protocol was most sensitive to uncertainty in skull conductivity. Finally, the probability that the current density amplitude in the auditory cortex target region is supra-threshold was below 50%. SIGNIFICANCE The results suggest that an uncertain conductivity profile in computational models of tDCS can have a substantial influence on the prediction of optimal stimulation protocols for stimulation of the auditory cortex. The investigations carried out in this study present a possibility to predict the probability of providing a therapeutic effect with an optimized electrode system for future auditory clinical and experimental procedures of tDCS applications.

[1]  Jens Haueisen,et al.  Use of a priori information in estimating tissue resistivities--application to human data in vivo. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[2]  Dana H. Brooks,et al.  Visualizing simulated electrical fields from electroencephalography and transcranial electric brain stimulation: A comparative evaluation , 2014, NeuroImage.

[3]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human auditory cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  A. Dale,et al.  Conductivity tensor mapping of the human brain using diffusion tensor MRI , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  S. Schiff,et al.  Sensitivity of Neurons to Weak Electric Fields , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  A stochastic finite element procedure for moment and reliability analysis , 2006 .

[7]  U. van Rienen,et al.  Modelling the probabilistic neural activation in deep brain stimulation: Influence of uncertainty in the parameters of the electrode-tissue-interface , 2013, 2013 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory.

[8]  D. Tuch.  Diffusion MRI of complex tissue structure , 2002 .

[9]  L. Parra,et al.  Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  Dana H. Brooks,et al.  A pipeline for the simulation of transcranial direct current stimulation for realistic human head models using SCIRun/BioMesh3D , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Andreas Galka,et al.  Combining EEG and MEG for the Reconstruction of Epileptic Activity Using a Calibrated Realistic Volume Conductor Model , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  W. Sutherling,et al.  Conductivities of Three-Layer Human Skull , 2004, Brain Topography.

[13]  P. V. van Rijen,et al.  Measurement of the Conductivity of Skull, Temporarily Removed During Epilepsy Surgery , 2004, Brain Topography.

[14]  W. Sutherling,et al.  Conductivities of Three-Layer Live Human Skull , 2004, Brain Topography.

[15]  Guillaume Crevecoeur,et al.  A sensor sensitivity and correlation analysis through polynomial chaos in the EEG problem , 2014 .

[16]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  A Sparse Grid Stochastic Collocation Method for Partial Differential Equations with Random Input Data , 2008, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[17]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  B. Gordon,et al.  Target Optimization in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[19]  Robert M. Kirby,et al.  Cardiac Position Sensitivity Study in the Electrocardiographic Forward Problem Using Stochastic Collocation and Boundary Element Methods , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and the combined analysis of SEF/SEP data , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  David R. Wozny,et al.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[23]  D. Xiu.  Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach , 2010 .

[24]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Subject position affects EEG magnitudes , 2013, NeuroImage.

[25]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[26]  Ursula van Rienen,et al.  Influence of Uncertainties in the Material Properties of Brain Tissue on the Probabilistic Volume of Tissue Activated , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Ursula van Rienen,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis of the probabilistic volume of tissue activated in a volume conductor model for deep brain stimulation , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[28]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transient tinnitus suppression induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, European journal of neurology.

[30]  Moritz Dannhauer,et al.  Modeling of the human skull in EEG source analysis , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[31]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1992 .

[32]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources , 2007, NeuroImage.

[33]  C H Wolters,et al.  Corrigendum: Complete electrode model in EEG: relationship and differences to the point electrode model , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  L. Bindman,et al.  Long-lasting Changes in the Level of the Electrical Activity of the Cerebral Cortex produced by Polarizing Currents , 1962, Nature.

[35]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  Stochastic Markovian modeling of electrophysiology of ion channels: reconstruction of standard deviations in macroscopic currents. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  O. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity. , 1962, Experimental neurology.

[37]  C. Gabriel,et al.  Electrical conductivity of tissue at frequencies below 1 MHz , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  Michael S. Eldred,et al.  Sparse Pseudospectral Approximation Method , 2011, 1109.2936.

[39]  A. Tarakanova,et al.  Molecular modeling of protein materials: case study of elastin , 2013 .

[40]  I. Sobol.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[41]  Robert Michael Kirby,et al.  Application of Stochastic Finite Element Methods to Study the Sensitivity of ECG Forward Modeling to Organ Conductivity , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.