Torsion resistance of the Ball Head System screw and screwdriver for angled screw channels on implant prosthetics.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the torsion resistance of the Ball Head System (BHS) screw and screwdriver set at 0o, 20o and 30o angulations. Secondarily, to compare the BHS set with the 1.3 mm hexagonal screwdriver system (HexS) at 20o and analyze the condition of the BHS after 10 and 30 iterations with 30 N·cm torque at 30o angulation. A workbench made from type 4 plaster with 6 steel implant replicas (external hexagon 4.1 mm) inserted at 0o, 20o and 30o angulation was designed. An analogical torque meter was used. The deformations produced on the whole set were examined by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy. A descriptive analysis was performed. The maximum torque performance for BHS at 30o angulation was 54±12 N·cm. Most screws could be removed despite the deformations produced. At 20o angulation, the BHS set achieved an average torque resistance of 67±12 N·cm, while the HexS failed at 45±2 N·cm. Although the iterations performed at 30 N·cm torque and 20o angulation produced some deformations on BHS sets, these could be tightened and unscrewed. The BHS allows tightening at a torque of up to 54 N·cm. Under the same conditions, BHS showed more torque resistance than HexS. Deformation of BHS sets was directly related to the number of iterations.

[1]  Carlos Flores,et al.  Frequency of Technical Complications in Fixed Implant Prosthesis: The Effect of Prosthesis Screw Emergence Correction by Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing. , 2018, The Journal of oral implantology.

[2]  F. Gil,et al.  Novel Ball Head Screw and Screwdriver Design for Implant-Supported Prostheses With Angled Channels: A Finite Element Analysis. , 2018, The Journal of oral implantology.

[3]  G. Veronesi,et al.  Digital versus Analog Procedures for the Prosthetic Restoration of Single Implants: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 1 Year of Follow-Up , 2018, BioMed research international.

[4]  L. Fiorillo,et al.  FEM and Von Mises Analysis on Prosthetic Crowns Structural Elements: Evaluation of Different Applied Materials , 2017, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[5]  Eugenio Guglielmino,et al.  FEM Analysis of Mandibular Prosthetic Overdenture Supported by Dental Implants: Evaluation of Different Retention Methods , 2015, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[6]  Atais Bacchi,et al.  Loosening torque of Universal Abutment screws after cyclic loading: influence of tightening technique and screw coating , 2015, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[7]  Eva Berroeta,et al.  Dynamic Abutment: A method of redirecting screw access for implant-supported restorations: Technical details and a clinical report. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: a meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  E. Guglielmino,et al.  FEM and Von Mises analyses of different dental implant shapes for masticatory loading distribution. , 2014, ORAL & implantology.

[10]  Mohammad Assaf,et al.  Screw-retained crown restorations of single implants: A step-by-step clinical guide , 2014, European journal of dentistry.

[11]  Eugenio Guglielmino,et al.  FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis. , 2014, International journal of clinical and experimental medicine.

[12]  Jung-Bo Huh,et al.  Influence of the implant-abutment connection design and diameter on the screw joint stability , 2014, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[13]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  J. Palamara,et al.  Screw head design: an experimental study to assess the influence of design on performance. , 2004, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[15]  Hiroshi Hirayama,et al.  Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[16]  Kenneth G Boberick,et al.  Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses. , 2002, The Journal of oral implantology.

[17]  T. Kaus,et al.  Evolution of the Concept of Angulated Abutments in Implant Dentistry:14-year Clinical Data , 2002, Implant dentistry.

[18]  U. Brägger,et al.  Influence of prosthesis type and retention mechanism on complications with fixed implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review applying multivariate analyses. , 2015, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[19]  U. Brägger,et al.  Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions--a systematic review. , 2014, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[20]  German O Gallucci,et al.  A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients. , 2012, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[21]  J A Holloway,et al.  Implant screw mechanics. , 1998, Dental clinics of North America.