Subglottal resonances and distinctive features

Abstract This paper addresses the phonetic basis of the distinctive feature [±back]. The second subglottal resonance (Sg2) is known to fall near the boundary between [−back] and [+back] vowels, and it has been claimed that Sg2 actually defines this distinction. In this paper, new evidence in support of this hypothesis is presented from 14 adult and 9 child speakers of American English, in which accelerometer recordings of subglottal acoustics were made simultaneously with speech recordings. The first three formants and the second subglottal resonance were measured, and both Sg2 and F3–3.5 bark were tested as boundaries between front and back vowels in the F2-dimension. It was found that Sg2 provides a reliable boundary between front and back vowels for children of all ages, as well as for adults, whereas F3–3.5 bark provides a similarly reliable boundary only for older children and adults. Furthermore, a study of connected speech in one adult male indicated that Sg2 forms a boundary between front and back vowels in such speech as well as in laboratory speech. Some implications for quantal theory and landmark theory are discussed, as well as the possibility that subglottal resonances might play a broader role in speech production.

[1]  E. Weibel.  Morphometry of the Human Lung , 1965, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[2]  E. E. David,et al.  Human communication : a unified view , 1972 .

[3]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[4]  L. A. Chistovich.  Central auditory processing of peripheral vowel spectra. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  Patterns of sounds , 1986 .

[6]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Computational aeroacoustics of phonation, part I: Computational methods and sound generation mechanisms. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Steven M. Lulich,et al.  Subglottal Resonances and Vowel Formant Variability: A Case Study of High German Monophthongs and Swabian Diphthongs , 2008 .

[8]  H. S. Gopal,et al.  A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Harold A. Cheyne.  Estimating glottal voicing source characteristics by measuring and modeling the acceleration of the skin on the neck , 2002 .

[10]  Abeer Alwan,et al.  A reliable technique for detecting the second subglottal resonance and its use in cross-language speaker adaptation , 2008, INTERSPEECH.

[11]  Abeer Alwan,et al.  Speaker normalization based on subglottal resonances , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[12]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Diverse Acoustic Cues at Consonantal Landmarks , 2000, Phonetica.

[13]  Steven M. Lulich,et al.  A role for the second subglottal resonance in lexical access. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .

[15]  B. Suki,et al.  Airway geometry and wall mechanical properties estimated from subglottal input impedance in humans. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  George R. Wodicka,et al.  Modeling and measurement of flow effects on tracheal sounds , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  George R. Wodicka,et al.  An acoustic model of the respiratory tract , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Kenneth N Stevens,et al.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B. Suki,et al.  Branching airway network models for analyzing high-frequency lung input impedance. , 1993, Journal of applied physiology.

[20]  Steven M. Lulich,et al.  The role of lower airway resonances in defining vowel feature contrasts. , 2006 .

[21]  Xuemin Chi,et al.  Subglottal coupling and its influence on vowel formants. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Acoustics of children's speech: developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  Quantal theory, enhancement and overlap , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[24]  Christian Abry,et al.  Major trends in vowel system inventories , 1997 .

[25]  Sungbok Lee,et al.  Creation of two children's speech databases , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings.

[26]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Analytical expressions for critical‐band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency , 1980 .

[27]  Morgan Sonderegger.  Subglottal coupling and vowel space: an investigation in quantal theory. , 2004 .

[28]  Anja Geumann.  Formant trajectory dynamics in Swabian diphthongs , 1997, EUROSPEECH.

[29]  T Kaneko,et al.  Input acoustic-impedance measurement of the subglottal system. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Kiyoshi Honda,et al.  Effects of side cavities and tongue stabilization: Possible extensions of the quantal theory , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[31]  Morgan Sonderegger,et al.  Subglottal coupling and vowel space. , 2004 .

[32]  L. Boves,et al.  On subglottal formant analysis. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.