Familial breast cancer: some social, economic and ethical issues

ABSTRACT Demand for clinical services for breast cancer fam-ilies has grown enormously in recent years. Much attentionhas focused on high penetrance “breast cancer gene” muta-tions but these are rare and, overall, a more substantial con-tribution to the genetic component in breast cancer etiologycomes, almost certainly, from common low penetrance muta-tions or polymorphisms in genes that have yet to be identified.In offering services for breast cancer families, there should beopen acknowledgement of the high degree of uncertainty sur-rounding current practice – risk evaluation for any individualfamily member, the role of environmental factors interactingwith genetic predisposition and the value of any particularscreening or intervention protocol. Nevertheless, evidence isaccruing that most women derive psychological benefit fromenrolment in a familial cancer programme and that regularclinical/mammographic screening for those at increased riskis effective in detecting very early-stage tumours, even inyoung women. It is essential that prospective audit of the out -come of such programmes continues, including careful mea-sure of their cost-effectiveness. Advances in molecular tech-nology, leading to an increased rate of detection of causalmutations among breast cancer families will help to concen-trate resources on those at highest risk but will highlightimportant ethical questions relating to confidentiality, duty ofcare and possible discrimination against mutations-carriers. Ifthe effects of clinical and laboratory services for cancer fami-lies are shown clearly to be beneficial, it is likely that some ofthese ethical issues will become less contentious.

[1]  K. Heimdal,et al.  Efficacy of Early Diagnosis and Treatment in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer , 2002, Disease Markers.

[2]  Vida Zabric A Patient’s Perspective on Breast Cancer and the Implications of Genetic Testing , 2002, Disease Markers.

[3]  K. Heimdal,et al.  Costs and Benefits of Diagnosing Familial Breast Cancer , 2002, Disease markers.

[4]  J. Chang-Claude,et al.  Insurance Implications for Individuals with a High Risk of Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Europe , 2002, Disease markers.

[5]  O. Olopade,et al.  Pregnancy and risk of early breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 1999, The Lancet.

[6]  O. Olopade,et al.  Breast cancer risk after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 mutation carriers. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  B. Knoppers Status, sale and patenting of human genetic material: an international survey , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[8]  A. Cull,et al.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  D J Schaid,et al.  Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  C K Redmond,et al.  Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  B. Ponder,et al.  Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Hereditary Ovarian Cancer , 1998 .

[12]  T. Powles,et al.  Interim analysis of the incidence of breast cancer in the Royal Marsden Hospital tamoxifen randomised chemoprevention trial , 1998, The Lancet.

[13]  P. Boyle,et al.  Prevention of breast cancer with tamoxifen: preliminary findings from the Italian randomised trial among hysterectomised women , 1998, The Lancet.

[14]  A. Howell,et al.  Screening by mammography, women with a family history of breast cancer. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[15]  I. Ellis,et al.  Screening women aged less than 50 years with a family history of breast cancer. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[16]  T. Aas,et al.  Prospective findings in breast cancer kindreds: annual incidence rates according to age, stage at diagnosis, mean sojourn time, and incidence rates for contralateral cancer , 1998 .

[17]  Joy L. Johnson,et al.  Communicating cancer risk information: the challenges of uncertainty. , 1998, Patient education and counseling.

[18]  B. Henderson,et al.  Does oral contraceptive use increase the risk of breast cancer in women with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations more than in other women? , 1997, Cancer research.

[19]  A. MacDonald,et al.  How will improved forecasts of individual lifetimes affect underwriting? , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  J. Eyfjörd,et al.  Study of a single BRCA2 mutation with high carrier frequency in a small population. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[21]  D. Evans,et al.  Li-Fraumeni syndrome--a molecular and clinical review. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  S. Seal,et al.  Variation of risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with different germline mutations of the BRCA2 gene , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[23]  R. Eeles,et al.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  K. Heimdal,et al.  Inherited predisposition to breast carcinoma. Results of first round examination of 537 women at risk. , 1996, Anticancer research.

[25]  T. Powles,et al.  Anxiety in women "at risk' of developing breast cancer. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[26]  J. Eyfjörd,et al.  A single BRCA2 mutation in male and female breast cancer families from Iceland with varied cancer phenotypes , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[27]  J. Parkhill,et al.  Mutations revealed by sequencing the 5' half of the gene for ataxia telangiectasia. , 1996, Human molecular genetics.

[28]  H. Campbell,et al.  The future of breast and ovarian cancer clinics , 1995, BMJ.

[29]  D. Clayton,et al.  Germline mutations of the BRCA1 gene in breast and ovarian cancer families provide evidence for a genotype–phenotype correlation , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[30]  T. Sellers,et al.  Genetic services for familial cancer patients: a survey of National Cancer Institute cancer centers. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[31]  C. M. Steel Implications of studies of inherited predisposition for prevention and treatment , 1995 .

[32]  A. Howell,et al.  The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[33]  H. Lynch,et al.  Psychological aspects of monitoring high risk women for breast cancer , 1994, Cancer.

[34]  D. W. Thompson Genetic epidemiology of breast cancer , 1994, Cancer.

[35]  S. Narod,et al.  Genetics of breast and ovarian cancer. , 1994, British medical bulletin.

[36]  M. Stefanek,et al.  Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[37]  G. Lenoir,et al.  Increasing incidence of breast cancer in family with BRCA1 mutation , 1993, The Lancet.

[38]  F. Collins,et al.  Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. , 1993, JAMA.

[39]  W. Gregory,et al.  Advanced breast cancer: use of resources and cost implications. , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[40]  A. Howell,et al.  Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer. , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[41]  A. Hunt The patient's viewpoint. , 1992, Disease markers.

[42]  J. Harris The use of information (autonomy and confidentiality). , 1992, Disease Markers.

[43]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Advanced breast cancer and its prevention by screening. , 1992, British Journal of Cancer.

[44]  R. Houlston,et al.  Family history and risk of breast cancer. , 1992, Journal of medical genetics.

[45]  J. Holland,et al.  Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[46]  N. Morton,et al.  Genetic epidemiology of breast cancer in Britain , 1991, Annals of human genetics.

[47]  N. Wald,et al.  Breast cancer screening: the current position. , 1991, BMJ.

[48]  N Risch,et al.  Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[49]  T. Mack,et al.  Recall bias in subjective reports of familial cancer. , 1990, Epidemiology.

[50]  R. Mackay Dangerous Patients. Third Party Safety and Psychiatrists' Duties — Walking the Tarasoff Tightrope , 1990, Medicine, Science and the Law.

[51]  L. Cannon-Albright,et al.  Segregation and linkage analysis of nine Utah breast cancer pedigrees , 1988, Genetic epidemiology.

[52]  H. Lynch,et al.  Breast cancer genetics in an oncology clinic: 328 consecutive patients. , 1986, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[53]  R. Chaganti,et al.  Genetic epidemiology of familial aggregation of cancer. , 1986, Advances in cancer research.

[54]  J. Tobacman,et al.  INTRA-ABDOMINAL CARCINOMATOSIS AFTER PROPHYLACTIC OOPHORECTOMY IN OVARIAN-CANCER-PRONE FAMILIES , 1982, The Lancet.

[55]  N. Day,et al.  Familial breast cancer in iceland , 1982, International journal of cancer.

[56]  G. Bonser Heredity and Breast Cancer , 1941 .

[57]  P. Broca Traité des tumeurs , 1866 .