Risk-Based Modeling to Support NextGen Concept Assessment and Validation

This report provides a brief review of major recent risk-based modeling (RBM) approaches, with particular emphasis on how these tools can be applied during initial Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) concept development and how their use can be validated. Effective safety analysis should begin as early as possible during a systems life cycle in order to have maximum impact. Ideally, safety considerations should play a role even during a new systems concept definition and development. Elements of NextGen are currently progressing through these early phases. NextGen will increasingly rely on integrating multiple systems and information sources together to enable improved efficiency, safety, and reduced environmental impact. Ensuring that such complex interconnected systems are developed to meet safety goals requires corresponding advances in RBM and safety assessment approaches. This report does not cover the more detailed safety analyses that must be applied to mature system concepts. Rather, the focus is on approaches for hazard identification, scoping, and coarse risk estimation for systems in the early conceptual development stage, when details on the design and operation of the system have yet to be resolved. Risk models applied in this constrained context cannot be expected to provide the same complete, quantitative results as they do for mature systems. Following a review of prior models, this report continues with recommendations for RBM development, application, validation, and coordination between NextGen efforts. Also, a discussion on safety and concept development is provided.

[1]  Steve Bankes,et al.  Exploratory Modeling for Policy Analysis , 1993, Oper. Res..

[2]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[3]  Osman Balci,et al.  Verification, Validation And Accreditation Of Simulation Models , 1997, Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings,.

[4]  Robert G. Sargent,et al.  Verification and validation of simulation models , 1998, 1998 Winter Simulation Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36274).

[5]  Henk A. P. Blom,et al.  Accident Risk Assessment for Advanced Air Traffic Management , 2001 .

[6]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  R. Cooke,et al.  Expert judgement elicitation for risk assessments of critical infrastructures , 2004 .

[8]  J.T. Luxhoej,et al.  Modeling low probability/high consequence events: an aviation safety risk model , 2006, RAMS '06. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2006..

[9]  Henk A. P. Blom,et al.  Safety Risk Assessment by Monte Carlo Simulation of Complex Safety Critical Operations , 2006, SSS.

[10]  Daniel P. Murray A Tiered Approach to Flight Safety Analysis , 2006 .

[11]  Barry KIRWAN,et al.  A SYSTEMIC MODEL OF ATM SAFETY: THE INTEGRATED RISK PICTURE , 2007 .

[12]  Nassim Nicholas Taleb,et al.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .

[13]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Causal Model for Air Transport Safety: Final report , 2008 .

[14]  Fedja Netjasov,et al.  A review of research on risk and safety modelling in civil aviation , 2008 .

[15]  Marshall F Chalverus,et al.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .

[16]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety , 2012 .

[17]  Nickolas Guertin,et al.  DoD Open Systems Architecture Contract Guidebook for Program Managers: A Tool for Effective Competition , 2013 .

[18]  Henk A. P. Blom,et al.  Contrasting safety assessments of a runway incursion scenario: Event sequence analysis versus multi-agent dynamic risk modelling , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..