Seismic design of bridges with the participation of seat-type abutments

Abstract Abutments are not only earth-retaining systems as they also participate to the earthquake resisting system (ERS) of the bridge, under certain design considerations. Current research mainly focuses on the assessment of the performance of integral abutment bridges, while only a few studies dealt with the design of bridges with seat-type abutments accounting for their seismic contribution. Along these lines, a comparative study on seat-type abutment bridges was performed. The scope of the study was to identify possible differences in their seismic response affecting significant design parameters that are the displacements of the deck and the bending moments of the piers. The study employed three real bridges of variable total lengths, openings at the expansion joints, backfill models and moderate to strong earthquake excitations. Non-linear dynamic time history analysis was performed. The study showed that the strong participation of the abutment and the backfill soil can reduce effectively the seismic demand of bridges. However, attention should be given in bridges with tall piers, whose seismic forces can be increased under certain design conditions.

[1]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Validated Simulation Models for Lateral Response of Bridge Abutments with Typical Backfills , 2010 .

[2]  Stergios A. Mitoulis,et al.  Connection of Bridges with Neighborhooding Tunnels , 2010 .

[3]  M. Arockiasamy,et al.  STATE-OF-THE-ART OF INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGES: DESIGN AND PRACTICE , 2004 .

[4]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of Bridge Abutment Capacity and Stiffness during Earthquakes , 1997 .

[5]  Stergios A. Mitoulis,et al.  Cost-effectiveness related to the earthquake resisting system of multi-span bridges , 2010 .

[6]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[7]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  BRIDGE ABUTMENT MODEL SENSITIVITY FOR PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC DEMAND EVALUATION , 2002 .

[8]  Mark Aschheim,et al.  SEISMIC DESIGN OF COLUMNS OF SHORT BRIDGES ACCOUNTING FOR EMBANKMENT FLEXIBILITY , 2004 .

[9]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[10]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Kinematic response functions and dynamic stiffnesses of bridge embankments , 2002 .

[11]  S. Anagnostopoulos Equivalent viscous damping for modeling inelastic impacts in earthquake pounding problems , 2004 .

[12]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Effect of abutment modeling on the seismic response of bridge structures , 2008 .

[13]  Mahmoud El-Gamal,et al.  Nonlinear Bridge Abutment Stiffnesses: Formulation Verification and Design Curves , 1995 .

[14]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Design of seismic isolated structures : from theory to practice , 1999 .

[15]  C. Stewart Gloyd SEISMIC MOVEMENT AT BRIDGE ABUTMENTS , 1996 .

[16]  Kyle M. Rollins,et al.  Nonlinear Soil-Abutment-Bridge Structure Interaction for Seismic Performance-Based Design , 2007 .

[17]  Stavroula J. Pantazopoulou,et al.  Response simulation and seismic assessment of highway overcrossings , 2009 .

[18]  M. Arockiasamy,et al.  Design Implications of Creep and Shrinkage in Integral Abutment Bridges , 2005 .

[19]  Krzysztof Wilde,et al.  Pounding of superstructure segments in isolated elevated bridge during earthquakes , 1998 .

[20]  Murat Dicleli Integral Abutment-Backfill Behavior on Sand Soil-Pushover Analysis Approach , 2005 .

[21]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Lateral Performance of Full-Scale Bridge Abutment Wall with Granular Backfill , 2009 .

[22]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Seismic assessment of bridges accounting for nonlinear material and soil response, and varying boundary conditions , 2009 .

[23]  Krzysztof Wilde,et al.  Reduction of pounding effects in elevated bridges during earthquakes , 2000 .

[24]  Ahmed Elgamal,et al.  Large-Scale Passive Earth Pressure Load-Displacement Tests and Numerical Simulation , 2010 .

[25]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Seismic assessment of an overpass bridge accounting for non-linear material and soil response and varying boundary conditions , 2013 .

[26]  Husain J. Al-Gahtani Optimum Design of Buried Pipeline Block Anchors , 2009 .

[27]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Implications of Design Assumptions on Capacity Estimates and Demand Predictions of Multispan Curved Bridges , 2007 .