Causes and consequences of psychological contracts among knowledge workers in the high technology and financial services industries

As organizations shift the central focus of their competitive strategy away from value appropriation towards value creation it is to knowledge workers that they will look to provide the innovation to fuel their continued development. The state of the relationship between the knowledge worker and the employer - the psychological contract - will determine whether this source of innovation and creativity is released. In this study, we developed and tested a causal model of the causes and consequences of psychological contract. Over four hundred participants who were knowledge employees drawn from eleven leading edge companies in the high-technology software, manufacturing and financial services sector participated in the study. We found support for the hypothesis that the psychological contract and those organizational processes relating to procedural justice would have a direct effect on two critical organizational outcomes, namely, employee commitment and intention to remain with the organization. We also found support for the hypothesis that psychological contract variables mediated the relationship between organizational processes and employee commitment and intention to stay with the organization.

[1]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  The effects of met expectations on newcomer attitudes and behaviors: a review and meta-analysis. , 1992, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  Daniel C. Feldman,et al.  The Impact of Psychological Contract Violations on Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect , 1999 .

[3]  J. Guarino.  Book Review Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. By Denise M. Rousseau. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California , 1998 .

[4]  R. Tredgold.  Men Management and Mental Health , 1964, Mental Health.

[5]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm , 1994 .

[6]  S. Robinson.  Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract , 1996 .

[7]  Harry Levinson,et al.  Men, management, and mental health , 1962 .

[8]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[9]  P. Herriot,et al.  Contracting Careers , 1996 .

[10]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[11]  West,et al.  Effective Top Management Teams: An International Perspective , 2001 .

[12]  Stephen J. Carroll,et al.  Managing strategy implementation : an organizational behaviour perspective , 2000 .

[13]  A. Leung,et al.  Challenges to the psychological contract in Hong Kong , 2001 .

[14]  Lynne J. Millward,et al.  Psychological Contracts, Organizational and Job Commitment , 1998 .

[15]  E. Pedhazur.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction , 1982 .

[16]  Efrat Elron,et al.  Expatriate managers and the psychological contract. , 1994 .

[17]  David P. Lepak,et al.  The Human Resource Architecture: Toward a Theory of Human Capital Allocation and Development , 1999 .

[18]  E. Morrison,et al.  WHEN EMPLOYEES FEEL BETRAYED: A MODEL OF HOW PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION DEVELOPS , 1997 .

[19]  D. Bell.  The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society , 1973 .

[20]  N. Anderson,et al.  The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect , 1998 .

[21]  R. Sims.  Human resource management's role in clarifying the new psychological contract , 1994 .