Introduction of Si PERC Rear Contacting Design to Boost Efficiency of Cu(In,Ga)Se $_{\bf 2}$ Solar Cells

Recently, Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) solar cells have achieved 21% world-record efficiency, partly due to the introduction of a postdeposition potassium treatment to improve the front interface of CIGS absorber layers. However, as high-efficiency CIGS solar cells essentially require long diffusion lengths, the highly recombinative rear of these devices also deserves attention. In this paper, an Al2O3 rear surface passivation layer with nanosized local point contacts is studied to reduce recombination at the standard Mo/CIGS rear interface. First, passivation layers with well-controlled grids of nanosized point openings are established by use of electron beam lithography. Next, rear-passivated CIGS solar cells with 240-nm-thick absorber layers are fabricated as study devices. These cells show an increase in open-circuit voltage (+57 mV), short-circuit current (+3.8 mA/cm2), and fill factor [9.5% (abs.)], compared with corresponding unpassivated reference cells, mainly due to improvements in rear surface passivation and rear internal reflection. Finally, solar cell capacitance simulator (SCAPS) modeling is used to calculate the effect of reduced back contact recombination on high-efficiency solar cells with standard absorber layer thickness. The modeling shows that up to 50-mV increase in open-circuit voltage is anticipated.

[1]  W. Warta,et al.  Solar cell efficiency tables (version 36) , 2010 .

[2]  D. Flandre,et al.  Employing Si solar cell technology to increase efficiency of ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells , 2014, Progress in photovoltaics.

[3]  Kihwan Kim,et al.  Backwall superstrate configuration for ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells , 2014 .

[4]  Marc Burgelman,et al.  Modeling polycrystalline semiconductor solar cells , 2000 .

[5]  D. Hariskos,et al.  Compositional investigation of potassium doped Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with efficiencies up to 20.8% , 2014 .

[6]  Marika Edoff,et al.  Development of rear surface passivated Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film solar cells with nano-sized local rear point contacts , 2013 .

[7]  Wmm Erwin Kessels,et al.  Status and prospects of Al2O3-based surface passivation schemes for silicon solar cells , 2012 .

[8]  U. Helmersson,et al.  Size-controlled growth of nanoparticles in a highly ionized pulsed plasma , 2013 .

[9]  Debora Keller,et al.  Potassium-induced surface modification of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films for high-efficiency solar cells. , 2013, Nature materials.

[10]  M. Green,et al.  24% efficient PERL structure silicon solar cells , 1990, IEEE Conference on Photovoltaic Specialists.

[11]  E. Wallin,et al.  CIGS module manufacturing with high deposition rates and efficiencies , 2014, 2014 IEEE 40th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC).

[12]  Ulf Malm,et al.  Modelling and Degradation Characteristics of Thin-film CIGS Solar Cells , 2008 .

[13]  Marika Edoff,et al.  Improved Rear Surface Passivation of Cu(In,Ga)Se$_{\bf 2}$ Solar Cells: A Combination of an Al$_{\bf 2}$O $_{\bf 3}$ Rear Surface Passivation Layer and Nanosized Local Rear Point Contacts , 2014, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[14]  M. Powalla,et al.  Efficiency enhancement of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin‐film solar cells by a post‐deposition treatment with potassium fluoride , 2013 .

[15]  Denis Flandre,et al.  Highly reflective rear surface passivation design for ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells , 2015 .

[16]  Characterization of Cu(InGa)Se2 Solar Cells using Etched Absorber Layers , 2006, 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference.