Multivariate EEG analyses support high-resolution tracking of feature-based attentional selection

The primary electrophysiological marker of feature-based selection is the N2pc, a lateralized posterior negativity emerging around 180–200 ms. As it relies on hemispheric differences, its ability to discriminate the locus of focal attention is severely limited. Here we demonstrate that multivariate analyses of raw EEG data provide a much more fine-grained spatial profile of feature-based target selection. When training a pattern classifier to determine target position from EEG, we were able to decode target positions on the vertical midline, which cannot be achieved using standard N2pc methodology. Next, we used a forward encoding model to construct a channel tuning function that describes the continuous relationship between target position and multivariate EEG in an eight-position display. This model can spatially discriminate individual target positions in these displays and is fully invertible, enabling us to construct hypothetical topographic activation maps for target positions that were never used. When tested against the real pattern of neural activity obtained from a different group of subjects, the constructed maps from the forward model turned out statistically indistinguishable, thus providing independent validation of our model. Our findings demonstrate the power of multivariate EEG analysis to track feature-based target selection with high spatial and temporal precision.

[1]  Gustavo Rohenkohl,et al.  Testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates , 2015, eLife.

[2]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  John T. Serences,et al.  Computational advances towards linking BOLD and behavior , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  S. Luck,et al.  Attention to Features Precedes Attention to Locations in Visual Search: Evidence from Electromagnetic Brain Responses in Humans , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  W. Ziegler The Oxford Handbook Of Event Related Potential Components , 2016 .

[7]  S. Luck,et al.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses , 1994 .

[9]  M. Eimer The neural basis of attentional control in visual search , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Benoit Brisson,et al.  Dissociation of the N2pc and sustained posterior contralateral negativity in a choice response task , 2008, Brain Research.

[11]  D. Heeger,et al.  Cross-orientation suppression in human visual cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  石原 忍 Ishihara's tests for colour-blindness , 1966 .

[13]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4 , 2005, Science.

[14]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects , 2017, NeuroImage.

[15]  Bradley R. Postle,et al.  Decoding and Reconstructing the Focus of Spatial Attention from the Topography of Alpha-band Oscillations , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Serences,et al.  Near-Real-Time Feature-Selective Modulations in Human Cortex , 2013, Current Biology.

[17]  S. Luck,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Spatial Attention Can Be Allocated Rapidly and in Parallel to New Visual Objects , 2014, Current Biology.

[21]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding Seen and Attended Motion Directions from Activity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[22]  Radoslaw Martin Cichy,et al.  Resolving human object recognition in space and time , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  David W. Sutterer,et al.  The topography of alpha-band activity tracks the content of spatial working memory. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  D. Heeger,et al.  Decoding and Reconstructing Color from Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  The Rise of Cognitive Architectures , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[27]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[28]  B. Wandell Computational neuroimaging of human visual cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  Robert M. Kantner,et al.  An EEG Study , 1981 .

[30]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[31]  J. Haynes Brain Reading: Decoding Mental States From Brain Activity In Humans , 2011 .

[32]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[33]  R. Desimone,et al.  Responses of Neurons in Inferior Temporal Cortex during Memory- Guided Visual Search , 1998 .

[34]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Decoding Attended Information in Short-term Memory: An EEG Study , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  Valid population inference for information-based imaging: From the second-level t-test to prevalence inference , 2015, NeuroImage.