Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?

[1]  David Ogilvie,et al.  Pinpointing needles in giant haystacks: use of text mining to reduce impractical screening workload in extremely large scoping reviews , 2014, Research synthesis methods.

[2]  P. Doshi.  Transparency interrupted: the curtailment of the European Medicines Agency's Policy on access to documents. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[3]  J. Glanville,et al.  Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  Jesse A Berlin,et al.  From ClinicalTrials.gov trial registry to an analysis-ready database of clinical trial results , 2013, Clinical trials.

[5]  Su Golder,et al.  Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  Robin A. Paynter,et al.  Peer Review of Search Strategies , 2012 .

[7]  Su Golder,et al.  The performance of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE. , 2012, Health information and libraries journal.

[8]  W. Baine,et al.  The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , 2006, Italian Journal of Public Health.

[9]  Su Golder,et al.  THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES FOR ADVERSE EFFECTS DATA , 2012, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[10]  Su Golder,et al.  Failure or success of electronic search strategies to identify adverse effects data. , 2012, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[11]  Tom Jefferson,et al.  The Imperative to Share Clinical Study Reports: Recommendations from the Tamiflu Experience , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[12]  Thomas Kaiser,et al.  Routine development of objectively derived search strategies , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[13]  Ethan M Balk,et al.  A Web-based archive of systematic review data , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[14]  C. Del Mar,et al.  Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children , 2014, Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina.

[15]  T. Jefferson,et al.  Rethinking credible evidence synthesis , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Karen A Robinson,et al.  Understanding why evidence from randomised clinical trials may not be retrieved from Medline: comparison of indexed and non-indexed records , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Gerta Rücker,et al.  Boosting qualifies capture-recapture methods for estimating the comprehensiveness of literature searches for systematic reviews. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  M. Sampson,et al.  Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[19]  Ethan M Balk,et al.  Identifying Signals for Updating Systematic Reviews: A Comparison of Two Methods , 2011 .

[20]  Nicholas C. Ide,et al.  The ClinicalTrials.gov results database--update and key issues. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Sophia Ananiadou,et al.  Applications of text mining within systematic reviews , 2011, Research synthesis methods.

[22]  Matthew J. Thompson,et al.  Ensuring safe and effective drugs: who can do what it takes? , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  Howard Balshem,et al.  Finding Evidence for Comparing Medical Interventions , 2011 .

[24]  M. Broder,et al.  Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors treated with high dose octreotide-LAR: a systematic literature review. , 2015, World journal of gastroenterology.

[25]  S. Morton,et al.  Standards for Finding and Assessing Individual Studies , 2011 .

[26]  Julie Glanville,et al.  Identifying economic evaluations for health technology assessment , 2010, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[27]  Andrew Booth,et al.  How much searching is enough? Comprehensive versus optimal retrieval for technology assessments , 2010, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[28]  Michele Tarsilla.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[29]  E. Tacconelli.  Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2010 .

[30]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  Carol Lefebvre,et al.  An Evidence Based Checklist for the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS EBC) , 2010 .

[32]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics.

[33]  Roberta Bronson Fitzpatrick.  Science.gov: Gateway to Government Science Information , 2010, Medical reference services quarterly.

[34]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[35]  Julie Glanville,et al.  How well do search filters perform in identifying economic evaluations in MEDLINE and EMBASE , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[36]  David Moher,et al.  An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[38]  T. Pang,et al.  From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration , 2009, Journal of evidence-based medicine.

[39]  K Ann McKibbon,et al.  The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[40]  Adriana Yoshii,et al.  Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews. , 2009, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[41]  Akers,et al.  Systematic Reviews [ressource électronique]. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2009 .

[42]  Liz Payne,et al.  So many filters, so little time: the development of a search filter appraisal checklist. , 2008, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[43]  Anne Eisinga,et al.  Enhancing access to reports of randomized trials published world-wide – the contribution of EMBASE records to the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library , 2008, Emerging themes in epidemiology.

[44]  David Moher,et al.  No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[45]  K. Shojania,et al.  Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[46]  S. Golder,et al.  Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[47]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature search strategies for identifying methodologically sound causation and prognosis studies. , 2008, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[48]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) , 2007, PloS one.

[49]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  Estimating the Horizon of Articles to Decide When to Stop Searching in Systematic Reviews: An Example Using a Systematic Review of RCTs Evaluating Osteoporosis Clinical Decision Support Tools , 2007, AMIA.

[50]  J. Glanville,et al.  Do published search filters to identify diagnostic test accuracy studies perform adequately? , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[51]  E. von Elm,et al.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[52]  M. Egger,et al.  Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[53]  David Moher,et al.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[54]  M. Clarke,et al.  Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[55]  Kate Flemming,et al.  Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[56]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  EMBASE search strategies achieved high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving methodologically sound systematic reviews. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[57]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Retrieving Qualitative Studies in PsycINFO , 2006, Evaluation & the health professions.

[58]  R. Haynes,et al.  Comparison of top-performing search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies and systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[59]  R. Schlosser,et al.  Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice: the application of traditional and comprehensive Pearl Growing. A review. , 2006, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[60]  Cynthia Fraser,et al.  Identifying observational studies of surgical interventions in MEDLINE and EMBASE , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[61]  D. Moher,et al.  An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[62]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Optimal search strategies for detecting cost and economic studies in EMBASE , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[63]  Carol Lefebvre,et al.  How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[64]  Leslie A. Walters,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Retrieving Clinically Relevant Qualitative Studies in EMBASE , 2006, Qualitative health research.

[65]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Research Paper: Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Prognostic Studies in EMBASE: An Analytic Survey , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[66]  Kay Dickersin,et al.  Selective exposure reporting and Medline indexing limited the search sensitivity for observational studies of the adverse effects of oral contraceptives. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[67]  et al.,et al.  Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound and relevant causation studies in EMBASE , 2005, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[68]  John Hoey,et al.  Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. , 2005, Circulation.

[69]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  BMC Medicine BioMed Central , 2003 .

[70]  M. Grant.  How does your searching grow? A survey of search preferences and the use of optimal search strategies in the identification of qualitative research. , 2004, Health information and libraries journal.

[71]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Relevant Qualitative Studies in MEDLINE , 2004, MedInfo.

[72]  Lucas M Bachmann,et al.  Identifying diagnostic accuracy studies in EMBASE. , 2003, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[73]  J Glanville,et al.  Accessing the online evidence: a guide to key sources of research information on clinical and cost effectiveness , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[74]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Causation Studies in MEDLINE , 2003, AMIA.

[75]  M. Clarke,et al.  A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[76]  Steve McDonald,et al.  Development of the Cochrane Collaboration’s Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials , 2002, Evaluation & the health professions.

[77]  Steve McDonald,et al.  The Contribution of Handsearching European General Health Care Journals to the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register , 2002, Evaluation & the health professions.

[78]  Carol Lefebvre,et al.  The effect of postings information on searching behaviour A statistical approach to designing search filters to find systematic reviews : objectivity enhances accuracy , 2001 .

[79]  Carol Lefebvre,et al.  Identifying systematic reviews in MEDLINE: developing an objective approach to search strategy design , 1998, J. Inf. Sci..

[80]  George Davey Smith,et al.  meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies , 1998 .

[81]  M. Egger,et al.  Bias in location and selection of studies. , 1998, BMJ.

[82]  M. Airey,et al.  Use of the capture-recapture technique to evaluate the completeness of systematic literature searches , 1996, BMJ.

[83]  M. Clarke,et al.  Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1995, BMJ.

[84]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1994 .

[85]  N L Wilczynski,et al.  Assessment of methodologic search filters in MEDLINE. , 1993, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[86]  P. Riis.  International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. , 1990, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[87]  G GordilloPaniagua,et al.  The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 1981 .