Rotational error in path integration: encoding and execution errors in angle reproduction

Path integration is fundamental to human navigation. When a navigator leaves home on a complex outbound path, they are able to keep track of their approximate position and orientation and return to their starting location on a direct homebound path. However, there are several sources of error during path integration. Previous research has focused almost exclusively on encoding error—the error in registering the outbound path in memory. Here, we also consider execution error—the error in the response, such as turning and walking a homebound trajectory. In two experiments conducted in ambulatory virtual environments, we examined the contribution of execution error to the rotational component of path integration using angle reproduction tasks. In the reproduction tasks, participants rotated once and then rotated again to face the original direction, either reproducing the initial turn or turning through the supplementary angle. One outstanding difficulty in disentangling encoding and execution error during a typical angle reproduction task is that as the encoding angle increases, so does the required response angle. In Experiment 1, we dissociated these two variables by asking participants to report each encoding angle using two different responses: by turning to walk on a path parallel to the initial facing direction in the same (reproduction) or opposite (supplementary angle) direction. In Experiment 2, participants reported the encoding angle by turning both rightward and leftward onto a path parallel to the initial facing direction, over a larger range of angles. The results suggest that execution error, not encoding error, is the predominant source of error in angular path integration. These findings also imply that the path integrator uses an intrinsic (action-scaled) rather than an extrinsic (objective) metric.

[1]  V. V. Marlinsky,et al.  Vestibular and vestibulo-proprioceptive perception of motion in the horizontal plane in blindfolded man—II. Estimations of rotations about the earth-vertical axis , 1999, Neuroscience.

[2]  William H Warren,et al.  Path Integration from Optic Flow and Body Senses in a Homing Task , 2002, Perception.

[3]  R Wehner,et al.  Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  E. Batschelet Circular statistics in biology , 1981 .

[5]  Peter J. Werkhoven,et al.  The Effects of Proprioceptive and Visual Feedback on Geographical Orientation in Virtual Environments , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  Nicholas J Kleene,et al.  The role of spatial memory and frames of reference in the precision of angular path integration. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[7]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Spatial orientation in humans: perception of angular whole-body displacements in two-dimensional trajectories , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Elizabeth R. Chrastil,et al.  Active and passive spatial learning in human navigation: acquisition of survey knowledge. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments , 2006, APGV '06.

[10]  W. Becker,et al.  Vestibular, optokinetic, and cognitive contribution to the guidance of passive self-rotation toward instructed targets , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  I. Israël,et al.  Self-rotation estimate about the vertical axis. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[12]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  William H Warren,et al.  How You Get There From Here , 2015, Psychological science.

[14]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Human navigation ability: Tests of the encoding-error model of path integration , 1999, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[16]  Elizabeth R. Chrastil,et al.  Does the human odometer use an extrinsic or intrinsic metric? , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[17]  M. Gresty,et al.  Self‐Controlled Reorienting Movements in Response to Rotational Displacements in Normal Subjects and Patients with Labyrinthine Disease , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Storing upright turns: how visual and vestibular cues interact during the encoding and recalling process , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Jeffrey S. Taube,et al.  Head direction cells and the neural mechanisms of spatial orientation , 2005 .

[20]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  How to find one's way in the labyrinth of path integration models , 1995 .

[21]  Y. Ivanenko,et al.  Space-time relativity in self-motion reproduction. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Visual Homing Is Possible Without Landmarks: A Path Integration Study in Virtual Reality , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[23]  A Berthoz,et al.  Spatial memory and path integration studied by self-driven passive linear displacement. I. Basic properties. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Locomotion Mode Affects the Updating of Objects Encountered During Travel: The Contribution of Vestibular and Proprioceptive Inputs to Path Integration , 1998, Presence.

[25]  P Péruch,et al.  Homing in Virtual Environments: Effects of Field of View and Path Layout , 1997, Perception.

[26]  Reinhart Jürgens,et al.  Vestibular perception of self-rotation in different postures: a comparison between sitting and standing subjects , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  D. R. Montello,et al.  Remembering Changes in Direction , 1989 .

[28]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Building a cognitive map by assembling multiple path integration systems , 2015, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[29]  Idiosyncratic orientation strategies influence self-controlled whole-body rotations in the dark. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Visual and vestibular factors influencing vestibular “navigation” , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Self-motion perception during a sequence of whole-body rotations in darkness , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  The Encoding-Error Model of Pathway Completion without Vision , 2010 .

[33]  Peter J. Werkhoven,et al.  Calibrating Visual Path Integration in VEs , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[34]  J. Thomson Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  A Berthoz,et al.  Spatial memory of body linear displacement: what is being stored? , 1995, Science.

[36]  William H. Warren,et al.  Environmental stability modulates the role of path integration in human navigation , 2015, Cognition.

[37]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Contribution of the otoliths to the calculation of linear displacement. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Acquisition of route and survey knowledge in the absence of vision. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[39]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Encoding Spatial Representations Through Nonvisually Guided Locomotion: Tests of Human Path Integration , 1997 .