Formation of seep bubble plumes in the Coal Oil Point seep field

The fate of marine seep gases (transport to the atmosphere or dissolution, and either bacterial oxidation or diffusion to the atmosphere) is intimately connected with bubble and bubble-plume processes, which are strongly size-dependent. Based on measurements with a video bubble measurement system in the Coal Oil Point seep field in the Santa Barbara Channel, California, which recorded the bubble-emission size distribution (Φ) for a range of seep vents, three distinct plume types were identified, termed minor, major, and mixed. Minor plumes generally emitted bubbles with a lower emission flux, Q, and had narrow, peaked Φ that were well described by a Gaussian function. Major plumes showed broad Φ spanning very small to very large bubbles, and were well described by a power law function. Mixed plumes showed characteristics of both major and minor plume classes, i.e., they were described by a combination of Gaussian and power law functions, albeit poorly. To understand the underlying formation mechanism, laboratory bubble plumes were created from fixed capillary tubes, and by percolating air through sediment beds of four different grain sizes for a range of Q. Capillary tubes produced a Φ that was Gaussian for low Q. The peak radius of the Gaussian function describing Φ increased with capillary diameter. At high Q, they produced a broad distribution, which was primarily described by a power law. Sediment-bed bubble plumes were mixed plumes for low Q, and major plumes for high Q. For low-Q sediment-bed Φ, the peak radius decreased with increasing grain size. For high Q, sediment-bed Φ exhibited a decreased sensitivity to grain size, and Φ tended toward a power law, similar to that for major seep plumes.

[1]  Libe Washburn,et al.  A Gas-Capture Buoy for Measuring Bubbling Gas Flux in Oceans and Lakes , 2001 .

[2]  Bernard P. Boudreau,et al.  Bubble growth and rise in soft sediments , 2005 .

[3]  Ira Leifer,et al.  The bubble mechanism for methane transport from the shallow sea bed to the surface: A review and sensitivity study , 2002 .

[4]  Marc Perlin,et al.  Bubble-size distributions produced by wall injection of air into flowing freshwater, saltwater and surfactant solutions , 2004 .

[5]  Ira Leifer,et al.  Optical Measurement of Bubbles: System Design and Application , 2003 .

[6]  L. Washburn,et al.  Dissolved hydrocarbon flux from natural marine seeps to the southern California Bight , 2000 .

[7]  Ira Leifer,et al.  Natural marine seepage blowout: Contribution to atmospheric methane , 2006 .

[8]  I. Leifer,et al.  Dynamics of the gas flux from shallow gas hydrate deposits: interaction between oily hydrate bubbles and the oceanic environment , 2003 .

[9]  G. Sills,et al.  The significance of gas for offshore operations , 1992 .

[10]  Derek C. Quigley,et al.  The world's most spectacular marine hydrocarbon seeps (Coal Oil Point, Santa Barbara Channel, California): Quantification of emissions , 1999 .

[11]  Ira Leifer,et al.  Characteristics and scaling of bubble plumes from marine hydrocarbon seepage in the Coal Oil Point seep field , 2010 .

[12]  T G Leighton,et al.  Preliminary mapping of void fractions and sound speeds in gassy marine sediments from subbottom profiles. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  R. C. Cooke,et al.  Bubble populations and spectra in coastal waters: A photographic approach , 1979 .

[14]  I. Leifer,et al.  Oceanic methane layers: the hydrocarbon seep bubble deposition hypothesis , 2002 .

[15]  Albert N. Link,et al.  The changing composition of R & D , 1985 .

[16]  K. Kvenvolden,et al.  Gaia's breath—global methane exhalations , 2005 .

[17]  Ira Leifer,et al.  Geologic control of natural marine hydrocarbon seep emissions, Coal Oil Point seep field, California , 2010 .

[18]  Phaedon C. Kyriakidis,et al.  The Spatial Scales, Distribution, and Intensity of Natural Marine Hydrocarbon Seeps near Coal Oil Point, California , 2004 .

[19]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  Dynamics of bubble growth and detachment from a needle , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  Lynn F. Gladden,et al.  Transition to pulsing flow in trickle‐bed reactors studied using MRI , 2005 .

[21]  I. Leifer,et al.  Measurement of marine hydrocarbon seep flow through fractured rock and unconsolidated sediment , 2005 .

[22]  Alan Judd,et al.  Seabed Fluid Flow: The Impact on Geology, Biology and the Marine Environment , 2007 .

[23]  D. Blanchard,et al.  Production of air bubbles of a specified size , 1977 .

[24]  Ira Leifer,et al.  A Study on the Temperature Variation of Rise Velocity for Large Clean Bubbles , 2000 .

[25]  I. Leifer,et al.  The acoustic signature of marine seep bubbles , 2007 .

[26]  Ira Leifer,et al.  Tracking an oil slick from multiple natural sources, Coal Oil Point, California , 2006 .

[27]  Gerard J. Kunz,et al.  Calibrating optical bubble size by the displaced-mass method , 2003 .

[28]  P. Mikolaj,et al.  Natural Oil Seepage at Coal Oil Point, Santa Barbara, California , 1970, Science.

[29]  H. Singh,et al.  Composition, chemistry, and climate of the atmosphere , 1995 .

[30]  P. Dando,et al.  Gas seep induced interstitial water circulation: observations and environmental implications , 1995 .

[31]  David E. Slauenwhite,et al.  Bubble shattering : Differences in bubble formation in fresh water and seawater , 1999 .

[32]  L. Washburn,et al.  Variability of gas composition and flux intensity in natural marine hydrocarbon seeps , 2005 .

[33]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[34]  Kerstin Jerosch,et al.  Methane discharge from a deep-sea submarine mud volcano into the upper water column by gas hydrate-coated methane bubbles , 2006 .

[35]  I. Leifer,et al.  Transient discharges from marine hydrocarbon seeps: spatial and temporal variability , 2004 .

[36]  W. Reeburgh,et al.  Attention turns to naturally occurring methane seepage , 2001 .

[37]  R. Keir,et al.  Methane in the northern Atlantic controlled by microbial oxidation and atmospheric history , 1999 .

[38]  J. Finch,et al.  A test of the Tate equation to predict bubble size at an orifice in the presence of frother , 2006 .

[39]  Ira Leifer,et al.  Engineered and Natural Marine Seep, Bubble-Driven Buoyancy Flows , 2009 .