Comparison of Volunteered Geographic Information Data Contributions and Community Development for Selected World Regions

Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) projects and their crowdsourced data have been the focus of a number of scientific analyses and investigations in recent years. Oftentimes the results show that the collaboratively collected geodata of one of the most popular VGI projects, OpenStreetMap (OSM), provides good coverage in urban areas when considering particular completeness factors. However, results can potentially vary significantly for different world regions. In this article, we conduct an analysis to determine similarities and differences in data contributions and community development in OSM between 12 selected urban areas of the world. Our findings showed significantly different results in data collection efforts and local OSM community sizes. European cities provide quantitatively larger amounts of geodata and number of contributors in OSM, resulting in a better representation of the real world in the dataset. Although the number of volunteers does not necessarily correlate with the general population density of the urban areas, similarities could be detected while comparing the percentage of different contributor groups and the number of changes they made to the OSM project. Further analyses show that socio-economic factors, such as income, can have an impact on the number of active contributors and the data provided in the analyzed areas. Furthermore, the results showed significant data contributions by members whose main territory of interest lies more than one thousand kilometers from the tested areas.

[1]  M. Haklay How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets , 2010 .

[2]  Pascal Neis,et al.  Interoperable location based services for 3D cities on the web using user generated content from OpenStreetMap , 2009 .

[3]  Pascal Neis,et al.  The Street Network Evolution of Crowdsourced Maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007-2011 , 2011, Future Internet.

[4]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  Towards Defining a Framework for the Automatic Derivation of 3D CityGML Models from Volunteered Geographic Information , 2012, Int. J. 3 D Inf. Model..

[5]  Angi Voß,et al.  A Comparison of the Street Networks of Navteq and OSM in Germany , 2011, AGILE Conf..

[6]  Pascal Neis,et al.  Towards Automatic Vandalism Detection in OpenStreetMap , 2012, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[7]  Weidong Song,et al.  The role of mobile volunteered geographic information in urban management , 2010, 2010 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics.

[8]  Guillaume Touya,et al.  Quality Assessment of the French OpenStreetMap Dataset , 2010, Trans. GIS.

[9]  Peter Mooney,et al.  The potential for using volunteered geographic information in pervasive health computing applications , 2013, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput..

[10]  Oded Nov,et al.  Determinants of wikipedia quality: the roles of global and local contribution inequality , 2010, CSCW '10.

[11]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  NeoGeography and the nature of geographic expertise , 2009, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[12]  Vyron Antoniou,et al.  How Many Volunteers Does it Take to Map an Area Well? The Validity of Linus’ Law to Volunteered Geographic Information , 2010 .

[13]  N. Budhathoki Participants' motivations to contribute geographic information in an online community , 2010 .

[14]  Monika Sester,et al.  Quality Analysis of OpenStreetMap Data Based on Application Needs , 2011, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[15]  P. Mooney,et al.  Comparison of the accuracy of OpenStreetMap for Ireland with Google Maps and Bing Maps , 2010 .

[16]  David Coleman,et al.  Volunteered Geographic Information: the nature and motivation of produsers , 2009, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[17]  John Domingue,et al.  The Future of the Internet , 1999, Academia Letters.

[18]  Peter Mooney,et al.  The Annotation Process in OpenStreetMap , 2012, Trans. GIS.

[19]  Richard P. Greene,et al.  WHICH ARE THE LARGEST? WHY LISTS OF MAJOR URBAN AREAS VARY SO GREATLY , 2009 .

[20]  P. Anderson What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education , 2007 .

[21]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[22]  Julian Hagenauer,et al.  Mining urban land-use patterns from volunteered geographic information by means of genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Claire Ellul,et al.  Assessing Data Completeness of VGI through an Automated Matching Procedure for Linear Data , 2012, Trans. GIS.

[24]  Yu-Wei Lin,et al.  A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making , 2011, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[25]  A. Zipf,et al.  A Comparative Study of Proprietary Geodata and Volunteered Geographic Information for Germany , 2010 .

[26]  Cristina V. Lopes,et al.  User contribution and trust in Wikipedia , 2009, 2009 5th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing.

[27]  Pascal Neis,et al.  Analyzing the Contributor Activity of a Volunteered Geographic Information Project - The Case of OpenStreetMap , 2012, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[28]  Dennis Zielstra,et al.  Comparative Study of Pedestrian Accessibility to Transit Stations Using Free and Proprietary Network Data , 2011 .

[29]  Sean W. Smith,et al.  The Quality of Open Source Production: Zealots and Good Samaritans in the Case of Wikipedia , 2007 .

[30]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure , 2008 .