Returning forests analyzed with the forest identity

Amid widespread reports of deforestation, some nations have nevertheless experienced transitions from deforestation to reforestation. In a causal relationship, the Forest Identity relates the carbon sequestered in forests to the changing variables of national or regional forest area, growing stock density per area, biomass per growing stock volume, and carbon concentration in the biomass. It quantifies the sources of change of a nation's forests. The Identity also logically relates the quantitative impact on forest expanse of shifting timber harvest to regions and plantations where density grows faster. Among 50 nations with extensive forests reported in the Food and Agriculture Organization's comprehensive Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005, no nation where annual per capita gross domestic product exceeded $4,600 had a negative rate of growing stock change. Using the Forest Identity and national data from the Assessment report, a single synoptic chart arrays the 50 nations with coordinates of the rates of change of basic variables, reveals both clusters of nations and outliers, and suggests trends in returning forests and their attributes. The Forest Identity also could serve as a tool for setting forest goals and illuminating how national policies accelerate or retard the forest transitions that are diffusing among nations.

[1]  S. Hecht,et al.  Globalization, Forest Resurgence, and Environmental Politics in El Salvador , 2006 .

[2]  A. Mather,et al.  Assessing the world's forests , 2005 .

[3]  Shilong Piao,et al.  Forest biomass carbon stocks in China over the past 2 decades: Estimation based on integrated inventory and satellite data , 2005 .

[4]  Jingyun Fang,et al.  Biomass carbon accumulation by Japan's forests from 1947 to 1995 , 2005 .

[5]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Importing Timber, Exporting Ecological Impact , 2005, Science.

[6]  M. Obersteiner,et al.  Information Technology and the Forest Sector , 2005 .

[7]  T. Aide,et al.  Globalization, Migration, and Latin American Ecosystems , 2004, Science.

[8]  V. K. Dadhwal,et al.  Assessment of Major Pools and Fluxes of Carbon in Indian Forests , 2004 .

[9]  Yoon-Seok Chang,et al.  Large rate of uptake of atmospheric carbon dioxide by planted forest biomass in Korea , 2002 .

[10]  C. Peng,et al.  Changes in Forest Biomass Carbon Storage in China Between 1949 and 1998 , 2001, Science.

[11]  K Geissler,et al.  Foreign affairs. , 2001, Radiologic technology.

[12]  D. Victor,et al.  Restoring the Forests , 2000 .

[13]  Pisarenko,et al.  Development of Forest Resources in the European Part of the Russian Federation , 2000 .

[14]  Robert Mendelsohn,et al.  Forest Management, Conservation, and Global Timber Markets , 1999 .

[15]  A. Mather,et al.  The course and drivers of the forest transition: The case of France , 1999 .

[16]  O. Kandler Historical declines and diebacks of central European forests and present conditions , 1992 .

[17]  M. E. Lewis Americans and their forests: A historical geography , 1992 .

[18]  Michael Williams,et al.  Americans and Their Forests. A Historical Geography. , 1990 .

[19]  Marion Clawson,et al.  Forests in the Long Sweep of American History , 1979, Science.

[20]  Torsten Hägerstrand,et al.  Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process , 1967 .

[21]  S. W. Wooldridge,et al.  London essays in geography : Rodwell Jones memorial volume , 1951 .

[22]  THE FOREST RESOURCES OF THE UNITED STATES. , 1896, Science.